Problem finding the transformation in this case

  • Thread starter Thread starter subopolois
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the transformation matrix for a reflection across the line y = -x. The original poster presents their interpretation of the transformation and compares it to a reference answer found in a textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the transformation of the vector (1,1) and its reflection to (-1,-1). Questions arise about how to derive the transformation matrix T from this reflection and the apparent discrepancy between the original poster's matrix and the textbook's answer.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the assumptions behind the transformation matrix, and discussing various methods to derive T. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for additional equations to solve for the components of T.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of how different bases can lead to different representations of the same transformation, highlighting the complexity of linear transformations and matrix representation.

subopolois
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


give the matrix in the transformation T in each case:
T: is a reflection in the line y= -x


Homework Equations


none that i know of for this question


The Attempt at a Solution


i know y= -x goes from the top left to bottom right in a cartesian plane, so the reflection of the line with initial point (1,1) in the first quadrant would end up in the third quadrant. i get my answer as:
-1 0
0-1
but the answer in the back of the book is:
0 -1
-1 0
why is their matrix the exact opposite as mine?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, what does the vector(1,1) become once it is reflected along the line y=-x?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Well, what does the vector(1,1) become once it is reflected along the line y=-x?

it becomes (-1,-1)
 
Good, that means that:

[tex]T \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} -1 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

How would you go about solving this for T?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Good, that means that:

[tex]T \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} -1 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

How would you go about solving this for T?

im not sure with this one,wait would you just rearrange to find t?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Good, that means that:

[tex]T \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} -1 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

How would you go about solving this for T?

but how does it end up being:
0 -1
-1 0
and not
-1 0
0 -1
?
 
There is more than one method, but I would write:

[tex]T \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} T_{11} & T_{12} \\ T_{21} & T_{22} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} -1 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Then carry out the matrix multiplication and solve for the components of T...if you want to use this method, you will also need another equation of the same form...what does T do to the vector (-1,1)?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
There is more than one method, but I would write:

[tex]T \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} T_{11} & T_{12} \\ T_{21} & T_{22} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} -1 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Then carry out the matrix multiplication and solve for the components of T...if you want to use this method, you will also need another equation of the same form...what does T do to the vector (-1,1)?

i still don't see how since the point (1,1) is transformed to (-1,-1) it gives
0 -1
-1 0
when i see this it says to me, that y= -1 from the first column when i think it should be x=-1 in the first column and likewise with the second column
 
Well, what is T suuposed to do to the vector (-1,1)...does your T actually do that?

Since there are 4 unique elements to T, you need four equations to solve for them...looking at the effect of T on a single vector only gives you two equations, so you need to consider the effect on two vectors.
 
  • #10
If A is a linear transformation from vector space V to itself and {e1, e2, ..., en} is a basis for V, you can find the matrix representation for A by applying to each of the basis vectors in turn. For example, suppose the matrix representation of A, in that basis, is
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}a_{11} & a_{12} & a{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a{32} & a_{33}\end{array}\right][/tex]
then, since the array representation of the basis vectors is just [1, 0, 0], [0, 1, 0], [0, 0 , 1], Applying A to e1 is just
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}a_{11} & a_{12} & a{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a{32} & a_{33}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{array}\left]= \left[\begin{array}{c} a_{11} \\ a_{21} \\ a_{31}\end{array}\right][/tex]
That is, applying A to e1 tells us what the first column is, e2, the second column, etc.

The standard basis for R2 is {[1 0], [0 1]}. Applying A to [1 0] gives [0 -1] and applying A to [0 1] is [0 -1] and to [0 1], [-1 0] so the matrix is
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc} 0 & -1 \\-1 & 0\end{array}\right][/tex]

However, if we use basis {[0 1],[1 0]}, that is the same vectors but in different order, that swaps the columns for A:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc} -1 & 0 \\0 & -1\end{array}\right][/tex]

In the first example, e1= [1 0], e2= [0 1]. In the second example, e1= [0 1], e2= [1 0].

Same vector space, same linear transformation, same vectors in each basis but, because the order or basis vectors is different, different bases and so different matrices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K