Problem involving Probability density function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a probability density function (pdf) and its relationship to cumulative distribution functions (cdf) in the context of continuous probability distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correctness of an inequality related to the pdf, discussing the equivalence of different notations in continuous distributions, and exploring the relationship between pdf and cdf at a specific point.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of notation in the context of continuous distributions, with some participants providing insights into the equivalence of expressions. Questions about potential typos and the correctness of interpretations are also being raised.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing potential ambiguities in the material and discussing the implications of specific mathematical expressions without reaching a definitive conclusion.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
425
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
stats
1648817667989.png


I just want to be certain, i think the inequality indicated is not correct...ought to be less than. Kindly confirm...This is a textbook literature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In terms of continuous probability distributions ##< 0.5## and ##\le 0.5## are equivalent, because the point ##0.5## itself has zero width (or zero measure if you prefer).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and chwala
PeroK said:
In terms of continuous probability distributions ##< 0.5## and ##\le 0.5## are equivalent, because the point ##0.5## itself has zero width (or zero measure if you prefer).
Thanks Perok, so the pdf indicated above is just the same as finding the cdf at ##x=0.5## right? giving us ##F(0.5)=0.125##.
 
chwala said:
Thanks Perok, so the pdf indicated above is just the same as finding the cdf at ##x=0.5## right? giving us ##F(0.5)=0.125##.
I think so. I haven't looked very carefully at the material you posted.
 
1648818911263.png


ought to be integral of ##f(x)## and not ##x##... or is it fine the way it is?
 
chwala said:
View attachment 299242

ought to be integral of ##f(x)## and not ##x##... or is it fine the way it is?
Isn't it obvious that's a typo?
 
ok cheers Perok.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K