Problem related to work Confused between two answers.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike-d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Work
AI Thread Summary
To lift a 5 kg bag to a countertop 1 meter high, the work done can be calculated in two ways. The first method calculates work as 50 Joules, based on the force needed to lift the bag against gravity. The second method considers the net work as the change in potential energy, leading to a total work of 100 Joules when including the work done against gravity. Clarification is provided that the correct interpretation of work done by the person lifting the bag is indeed 50 Joules, while the work done by gravity is -50 Joules. The discussion emphasizes understanding the distinction between total work, work done by the person, and work done by gravity.
mike-d
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How much work must you perform to lift a 5 kg bag from the floor to the countertop, 1 meter above the floor?

2. The attempt at a solution

A. You could say that any force greater than the weight of the bag would lift it up. Thus, the weight is 50 N and the force should at least 50 N and above.

since W= F * d * cos(theta)
W = 50 * 1 * cos0 = 50 Joules

B. My classmates insist that this is the correct way. The net work is equal to the change in potential energy, and the total work includes: Work done by weight, and work done by the force...

Work of weight = 50 * 1 * cos180 = -50 Joules
deltaPotential energy = PE2 -PE1 = 50 - 0 = 50 Joules

W(total) = W(weight) + W(force) = deltaPE
-50 + W(force) = 50 joules ==> W(force) = 100 Joules


Can anyone tell me which answer is the correct one? It seems to me that the second answer would be correct if you pulled the bag up suddenly and let it go and it would then stop mid-air at 1 meter. Can anyone verify this? Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct. If you are looking for total or net work, that's the change in KE (which is zero). But if you are looking for work done by you, which the question asks, that's the change in PE plus the change in KE which is 50 +0 = +50 J. If you are looking for the work done by the weight, that is the negative of the potential energy change, or -50 J.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Your answer is correct. If you are looking for total or net work, that's the change in KE (which is zero). But if you are looking for work done by you, which the question asks, that's the change in PE plus the change in KE which is 50 +0 = +50 J. If you are looking for the work done by the weight, that is the negative of the potential energy change, or -50 J.

Thanks for the reply :D

However I am confused as to why total work equals to the change in KE...

I would really appreciate it if you could explain it.
 
This involves a lot of formula manipulation...
We know that W = Fd and F = ma.
∴ W = mad

Solving for a from v22 = v12 + 2ad gives us
a = (v22 - v12)/2d

plugging that back into W = mad gives us
W = m[(v22 - v12)/2d]d
= \frac{1}{2}m(v22 - v12)
= \frac{1}{2}mv22 - \frac{1}{2}mv12

Notice anything familiar? \frac{1}{2}mv2 is our generic equation for KE.
\frac{1}{2}mv22 - \frac{1}{2}mv12 gives us ΔKE.

∴ W = ΔKE
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top