Undergrad How Do I Prove Polynomials Span P2?

Click For Summary
To prove that the given polynomials span P2, the student is attempting to set up an augmented matrix using the polynomials p1, p2, p3, and p4. They note that the last row of the augmented matrix results in a zero row, represented by the equation z - x - y = 0. This indicates a dependency among the polynomials, suggesting that they do not span the entire space P2. The student seeks clarification on how to proceed from this point to demonstrate the span effectively. Understanding the implications of the zero row is crucial for determining the span of the polynomials in the context of linear algebra.
HenryFa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I'm a CS student and I'm taking a course called Linear Algebra
it's very easy, but there is one thing that I'm not clearly understanding

i know how the general way to prove if given vectors span a vspace,
ex : v1,v2,v3 i put them in a Matrix form and prove the determinant Different than 0.
the logic I'm using is : k1V1 + k2V2 + K3V3 = W (W a vector in Vspace) i write it like this
(Coeff Matrix ) x (k1,k2,k3) = W
det of the coeff matrix can prove if the given vectors span

the thing is, when the coeff matrix is not Square, we cannot find the determinant
so we need to solve the augmented matrix.

in this case :
p1 = 1- x , p2 = 3 +x + 4x^2 , p3 = 5 + 2x + 7x^2 , p4 = -1+ 5x + 4x^2
i took w = (x,y,z) and to prove k1V1 + ... + k4V4 = W

to prove that these polynomials span (P2), the augmented matrix will have the last row like all zeros equal to z-x-y
what does it mean? how do i continue after that?
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This youtuber, 3blue1brown has several nice linear algebra videos and this one may help with your understanding of span:

 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
20K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
725