Problem with gravity and masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter atom888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's gravitational equation F=Gm1m2/r^2 and the concept of a constant value, referred to as "Z," derived from the equation. The original poster suggests that Z remains unchanged regardless of the distance between two masses, leading to confusion when considering different mass combinations. However, responses clarify that Z is not independent of the distance r; rather, it is a function of r, meaning that changes in distance will affect the value of Z. The conversation emphasizes that while Z can have different values for varying masses, it ultimately does not hold significant meaning outside of its dependence on r. The conclusion drawn is that the relationship between Z and r is essential to understanding gravitational interactions.
atom888
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
hi guys,

I was playing around with Newton Equation F=Gm1m2/r^2

I separate Fr^2 = Gm1m2 . This is bugging me. Fr^2 is a constant for a given 2 bodies(i call Z) of masses. That means that no matter what the distance r in between the two bodies, Z doesn't change. So i take my thought alittle further. Suppose the two bodies are almost infinite small with say ... 5 and 10 mass. so Z value is 50G. Since no matter how close u put them together, the value Z doesnt' change. I put them so close together that they almost like 1 body with a total mass of 15mass. Now I imagine what if they are 7 and 8 mass. The Z value is 56G. I put them throught the same process and let them come so close together that they're almost 1 body with 15mass. Now it looks like I have two identical bodies with different Z value. It seems disturbing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but "Z" doesn't mean anything unless the bodies are separated and if you separate them in two different ways it shouldn't be surprising that you get two different "Z values".
 
I guess the question is... what does Z means. lol I imagine r^2 as a square and F go up and down to have a constant volume. Though I don't know what it means, but it seems unique.
 
atom888 said:
I guess the question is... what does Z means. lol I imagine r^2 as a square and F go up and down to have a constant volume. Though I don't know what it means, but it seems unique.

it doesn't mean a thing besides G*M_1*M_2... which has only one value for a given M_1 and M_2 but may be different for different values of M_1 and M_2... even when M_1 + M_2 =M_tot is fixed, as you see in your example. but that, too, is meaningless.
 
olgranpappy said:
it doesn't mean a thing besides G*M_1*M_2... which has only one value for a given M_1 and M_2 but may be different for different values of M_1 and M_2... even when M_1 + M_2 =M_tot is fixed, as you see in your example. but that, too, is meaningless.


Fine! I'll keep it as an souvenir. lol
 
Z is a function of r. You can't say that Z is independent of r...basically, when r changes, Z changes. It's just like saying that y=Gx^2 but y doesn't change while x can, it's just completely nonsensical.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K