Problem with taking the divergence

  • Thread starter Thread starter lavster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
lavster
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
hi, can someone tell me how [itex]\nabla\dot(\frac{\widehat{r}}{r^2})=4\pi\delta^3(r)[/itex]

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lavster said:
hi, can someone tell me how [itex]\nabla\dot(\frac{\widehat{r}}{r^2})=4\pi\delta^3(r)[/itex]

thanks

How would you normally proceed with taking the divergence? What coordinate system is this in?
 
i would use spherical coord system. using the corresponding form of div. but this gives 0 as the r^2 in the formula is canceled but the r^2 in the div eqn
 
lavster said:
i would use spherical coord system. using the corresponding form of div. but this gives 0 as the r^2 in the formula is canceled but the r^2 in the div eqn

Sure, it gives zero everywhere, except at r=0. Remember, [itex]\frac{1}{r^2}[/itex] is undefined at [itex]r=0[/itex]:wink:

What does the divergence theorem tell you about the volume integral

[tex]\int_{\mathcal{V}}\left(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\frac{\hat{\mathbf{r}}}{r^2}\right)dV[/tex]

in two cases:

(1) When [itex]\mathcal{V}[/itex] is any volume enclosing the origin?
(2) When [itex]\mathcal{V}[/itex] is any volume not enclosing the origin?

Compare these results, along with the fact that [tex]\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\frac{\hat{\mathbf{r}}}{r^2}[/itex] is zero everywhere except at [itex]r=0[/itex], where it is undefined, to the properties defining the 3D Dirac Delta function.[/tex]