Solving Vanishing Tensor Eqn & Raising All Indices

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the vanishing tensor equation represented by $$\chi_\nu\nabla_\mu\chi_\sigma+\chi_\sigma\nabla_\nu\chi_\mu+\chi_\mu\nabla_\sigma\chi_\nu=0$$ and its implications when raising indices. It is established that if the metric is non-degenerate, raising the indices of a vanishing tensor equation results in another valid vanishing tensor equation. The key insight is that the condition $$D_{\alpha} g^{\mu\nu} = 0$$ ensures the validity of this transformation across different tensor forms. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the implications of metric properties in tensor calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus and covariant derivatives.
  • Familiarity with the properties of metrics, specifically non-degenerate metrics.
  • Knowledge of raising and lowering indices in tensor equations.
  • Basic grasp of differential geometry concepts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of non-degenerate metrics in differential geometry.
  • Learn about covariant derivatives and their implications in tensor calculus.
  • Explore the concept of tensor contraction and its applications.
  • Investigate the role of the metric tensor in raising and lowering indices.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and students engaged in advanced studies of differential geometry and tensor analysis, particularly those working with general relativity or related fields.

George Keeling
Gold Member
Messages
183
Reaction score
42
TL;DR
Problem with vanishing tensor equation with all indices down. Does it still vanish when they are up?
I have an equation $$
\chi_\nu\nabla_\mu\chi_\sigma+\chi_\sigma\nabla_\nu\chi_\mu+\chi_\mu\nabla_\sigma\chi_\nu=0
$$so we also have$$
g_{\nu\rho}g_{\mu\tau}g_{\sigma\lambda}\left(\chi^\rho\nabla^\tau\chi^\lambda+\chi^\lambda\nabla^\rho\chi^\tau+\chi^\tau\nabla^\lambda\chi^\rho\right)=0
$$Does that mean that$$
\chi^\rho\nabla^\tau\chi^\lambda+\chi^\lambda\nabla^\rho\chi^\tau+\chi^\tau\nabla^\lambda\chi^\rho=0
$$as well?

I can prove in two dimensions that $$
x_i=0\Rightarrow g_{ij}x^j=0\Rightarrow x^j=0
$$as long as the metric is not degenerate.

It would be horrendous to extend the proof to four dimensions and three indices. I think there is some more intuitive way to get from the second equation to the third, but the intuition eludes me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, actually it is true, the key point as you say is that ##g_{\mu\nu}## has an inverse, so instead of doing what you do in equation 2, why not contract the first equation with ##g^{\alpha\nu}g^{\beta\mu}g^{\gamma\sigma}##? What you get from there?

BTW, note that this is true only because ##D_{\alpha} g^{\mu\nu} = 0##, if this were not true then an expression true for covariant vectors wouldn't need to be true for contravariant ones.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: George Keeling and vanhees71
George Keeling said:
Summary:: Problem with vanishing tensor equation with all indices down. Does it still vanish when they are up?

Raising all the indexes on the LHS of a vanishing tensor equation with all indices down obviously gives a vanishing tensor equation with all indices up (since "raising an index" on ##0## on the RHS just gives ##0## again). As @Gaussian97 says, this will work as long as the metric is not degenerate (so the inverse metric is well-defined).
 
Brilliant Gaussian, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K