Problems on Length contraction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a problem involving length contraction in the context of special relativity. The original poster presents a scenario where a bar is moving at a significant fraction of the speed of light (0.5c) and seeks to understand how its length appears from different angles (parallel, perpendicular, and at a 60-degree tilt) relative to its direction of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the effects of velocity on the perceived length of the bar, emphasizing that only the length parallel to the direction of motion will contract. There are attempts to resolve the velocity components and clarify the implications of the bar's orientation at an angle of 60 degrees. Questions arise regarding the differences in observed lengths in various frames of reference.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants providing hints and exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to resolve the components of the bar's length and velocity, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answers.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves specific values from a textbook, including a velocity of 0.8c and a proper length of 1m. There are uncertainties regarding the observed lengths in different frames, particularly the discrepancy between expected and calculated values.

chingcx
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Problems on "Length contraction"

Homework Statement


This is a problem in my text. The idea is that a bar is moving with a high speed (say 0.5c) relative to us. We now want to know what will be the length appeared to us if the bar is parallel, perpendicular and 60 degrees tilted. And we are asked when the bar is tilted, how long is it in the co-moving frame.


Homework Equations



L=(Lo)/y where Lo is the proper length

The Attempt at a Solution



First two are very straight-forward, but I can't understand the difference between the last two questions. I tried to resolve the velocity component but still I could not work it out.
Any explanation is appreciated, thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok. So you know in this problem that the observer of the bar is going to see the bar a shorter length in the, let's say +x direction. The only parts of the bar that will shrink are the parts parallel to its' velocity; its not going to shrink vertically or diagonally. You will have to modify your Lorentz factor to account for the velocity in the x direction only.
 
lcon.gif



The length of any object in a moving frame will appear foreshortened in the direction of motion, or contracted. The amount of contraction can be calculated from the Lorentz transformation. The length is maximum in the frame in which the object is at rest.

lencon.gif
 

Attachments

  • lcon.gif
    lcon.gif
    5.2 KB · Views: 582
  • lcon.gif
    lcon.gif
    5.2 KB · Views: 517
  • lencon.gif
    lencon.gif
    15.9 KB · Views: 1,099
Winzer said:
Ok. So you know in this problem that the observer of the bar is going to see the bar a shorter length in the, let's say +x direction. The only parts of the bar that will shrink are the parts parallel to its' velocity; its not going to shrink vertically or diagonally. You will have to modify your Lorentz factor to account for the velocity in the x direction only.

Ok and thank you, but did you misunderstand my question? The bar is still moving in +x direction, but the orientation of the bar is not along +x direction, but make an angle of 60 degrees instead. So I think the velocity of the bar is still 0.5c in +x direction, and this is the thing I don't really understand...

physixguru said:
lcon.gif
The length of any object in a moving frame will appear foreshortened in the direction of motion, or contracted. The amount of contraction can be calculated from the Lorentz transformation. The length is maximum in the frame in which the object is at rest.

lencon.gif

Oh, I know this already, and this problem is somehow different in my opinion, thank you anyway.
 
At a just got up guess, you have to resolve the velecity for the x direction (as it is now moving in two planes relative to the stationary reference frame. Also you need to resolve the apparent length in the x direction using simple trig?
 
chingcx said:
Ok and thank you, but did you misunderstand my question? The bar is still moving in +x direction, but the orientation of the bar is not along +x direction, but make an angle of 60 degrees instead. So I think the velocity of the bar is still 0.5c in +x direction, and this is the thing I don't really understand...
Hint: Only the component of length parallel to the direction of motion will be contracted. Find the x & y dimensions in the proper ("moving") frame, then transform to the "stationary" frame.
 
Doc Al said:
Hint: Only the component of length parallel to the direction of motion will be contracted. Find the x & y dimensions in the proper ("moving") frame, then transform to the "stationary" frame.

Thank you. In fact, the textbook problem set v=0.8c (relative to a frame S) and L=1m, and the answers are 0.917m (as observed in the stick's rest frame) and 0.832m (as observed in S) respectively.

From your hint, I get 0.917m, which I expected to be the length observed in S and I've no idea how 0.832m is arrived at. So what's the difference we will see in stick's rest frame and in S frame?
 
The length of the stick in its rest frame is 1 m, of course. (That's what L = 1m means, I presume.) The length of the stick in frame S is about 0.917 m. I have no idea what 0.832 m is supposed to be.
 


Is the bar still at a 60 degree angle as seen in the unmoving frame?
 
  • #10


richard7893 said:
Is the bar still at a 60 degree angle as seen in the unmoving frame?
No. Since only the horizontal dimension 'contracts', the angle of the bar must change.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K