Problems with the Force equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter joshuaS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Force equation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application and interpretation of the force equation F=ma, particularly in the context of an object moving at a constant velocity and the implications during a collision. Participants explore the relationship between force, acceleration, momentum, and the effects of collisions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the application of F=ma when an object is moving at a constant velocity, arguing that it results in a force of 0N despite practical observations of force during collisions.
  • Another participant clarifies that if the car is moving at a constant velocity, the forces acting on it are balanced, leading to no net force.
  • A third participant introduces the concepts of momentum and kinetic energy, suggesting that these are relevant during collisions, as momentum is conserved and transferred during impacts.
  • Further, a participant emphasizes the impulse-momentum change theorem, explaining that a large force is transferred during a collision due to the rapid change in momentum.
  • Another participant notes that the equation F=ma gives the resultant force and does not imply the absence of force when acceleration is zero, but rather that forces are canceling out.
  • A participant references a physics text to highlight that forces are not isolated and depend on the interaction with other objects, illustrating that the same vehicle can exert different forces depending on what it collides with.
  • One participant suggests considering Newton's First Law of Motion, indicating that without a change in motion, there is no force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of force in relation to constant velocity and collisions. While some agree on the role of momentum and the nature of forces during impacts, there is no consensus on the initial question regarding the force of an object moving at constant velocity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the definitions of force, momentum, and the conditions under which they apply. There are unresolved aspects regarding the mathematical treatment of forces in different scenarios.

joshuaS
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok I've been trying to figure this out for some time now
We all know the formula F=ma
now acceleration is measured a=(v-v0)/t

now if there was an object in motion (lets say we measured the speed of a vehicle moving in a straight line at a constant speed of 10m/s over 30 seconds) this gives us v=10m/s and v0=10m/s and t=30s

so a=(15-15)/30=0
a=0

lets say the object weight 2000kg

F=(200)(0)=0

that gives us a F force of 0N

so if this hypothetical vehicle is traveling at 15m/s it has a Force of 0N. But if it smashes into a wall that wall suffers damage due to applied force. Where does this force come from? Using Newton's equation the car has no force but we know from practicality that a car going 15m/s has a lot of force to exhert on a stationary object

Is there another formula for F force if an object is at a constant velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That equation tells you that if the car is moving at a constant velocity then the sum of the forces acting on it are all canceling.

It does have momentum, which is what will be transferred in a collision (Along with kinetic energy). Momentum is mv and kinetic energy is 1/2mv^2
 
khemist said it. When something hits another object, you have an impulse. Momentum conservation states that momentum is always conserved. Because a car smashing into another object tries to transfer a large amount of momentum to the other object over a short period of time, a large force is transferred. Google Impulse-momentum change theorem.
Another way to look at it is using Newton's third law. No net force is being exerted on the CAR, that is true. But the car exerts a force on the WALL. Those are two different things.
 
The equation F = ma gives the RESULTANT force.
It does not mean there is no force when the acceleration is zero. It means the forces 'cancel out'
 
Here's a quote from a physics text I have:

"A force acts on an object.

Implicit in our concept of force is that a force acts on an object. In other words, pushes and pulls are applied to something - an object. From that object's perspective, it has a force exerted on it. Forces do not exist in isolation from the object that experiences them."

You are trying to define your vehicle as a force existing in isolation from the object that experiences it. The reason you can't do that is because that same vehicle at that velocity can represent an infinite number of different forces depending on what it hits. It exerts one force on a stationary wall, another on a car heading right toward it at 60mph and yet another on a car heading away from it at 5 m/s, for example.

Let's say the car hits the wall. NOW we have an acceleration. The car will go from 15 m/s to 0 in some short period of time. And whatever force that turns out to be, the wall will experience the same force.
 
Cool thanks guys, I get it now. Makes perfect sense
 
Try Newton's First Law of Motion. No change - no force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K