Prof. Walter Lewin Explains "That's that rho of s

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anhnha
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a statement made by Professor Walter Lewin regarding "rho of s" in the context of electric fields and voltage in a wire setup. Participants are seeking clarification on the meaning and implications of this term as it relates to the behavior of the wires in an electrical circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests help in understanding what Professor Lewin means by "that is that rho of s" in relation to voltage waves in wires.
  • Another participant suggests that "rho of s" refers to "rho sub s" and notes the timing in the video where this concept is discussed.
  • A participant asks for an explanation of how the positive and negative charges on the wires relate to "rho of s."
  • One participant recalls the setup involving two wires connected to opposite terminals of a battery, indicating a positive charge on one wire and a negative charge on the other.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants are seeking clarification and have not reached a consensus on the interpretation of "rho of s" or its implications in the context discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the exact setup and definitions related to "rho of s," as well as the specific context in which Professor Lewin discusses it.

anhnha
Messages
179
Reaction score
1
Please help me. What does the Prof. Walter Lewin mean by this "that is that rho of s"?
Here is the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp1orH7OC1c&list=SP854AA255B15C574C&index=17#t=31m20

If I take this wire and I make a cross-section of that wire-- this is wire 1 and this is wire 2-- then at any moment in time, as the voltage wave passes by, this may be positive, that is that rho of s, and this will be negative, that's that rho of s .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he starts talking about it around 8:30 and eventually makes his way to the right end of the board around 9:30. He has an electric field dependent on rho_s I think he meant "rho sub s" (rho with subscript s).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks. Can you explain why the positive or negative of these wires are related to the rho of s?
 
Any help?
 
I don't remember the exact setup and currently on mobile, but I thought the setup was the two wires were each on opposite terminals of a battery, so you have a positive charge on one wire and a negative on the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K