Projectile Motion-acceleration/velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter TBE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around projectile motion, specifically focusing on the relationships between displacement, velocity, and acceleration as derived from a self-formed equation. The original poster attempts to understand the vertical velocity of a projectile given their derived equations and experimental data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants inquire about the original poster's equations and the assumptions behind them, particularly questioning the time-dependent nature of the acceleration equation. There are discussions about the expected forms of displacement equations in projectile motion and the use of kinematic equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the proper form of equations for projectile motion and suggested the use of trigonometry to find the vertical component of velocity. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach and acknowledges a potential misunderstanding of the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has not utilized standard kinematic equations and is exploring their own derived equations, which may not align with established principles of projectile motion. There is a noted confusion regarding the expected form of the displacement equation and its implications for acceleration.

TBE
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I am just starting to get into using physics and calculus, and have just been doing my own experiments to understand the concepts etc better.
I have formed an equation for displacement against time for a projectile and have differentiated it to get equation of velocity, then differentiated that to get equation of acceleration.
Equation: a=14.28t-17.56 (t=time in seconds)
I also know that at t=1.23, v=0; intitial v=10.80m/s; total displacement=8.86m at t=2.46; a due to g=9.81m/s/s.
I would just like to know how to work out the vertical velocity, as the decceleration is greater than 9.81 (I think).
I have spent the last few hours looking around the internet, but I'm not really sure what I'm looking for.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please clarify all the given variables and what you are trying to find
 
Sorry,
I am trying to find the initial vertical velocity, ie the vertical velocity at time(t)=0.
equation for the acceleration of the projectile is a=14.28t+17.56
initial velocity=10.8m/s, ie v=10.8 @t=0; when v=0 (projectile at maximum height), t=1.23; displacement of projectile at t=1.23 is 4.43m.

I don't think I have explained this well, but basically I have an equation for acceleration that is a 'sloped' line, hence a is not constant. I want to know how I can find the initial vertical velocity. Because you would expect a due to g to be -9.81, I would normally multiply 1.23 by -9.81, but I can't see how that fits in with the equation that I've got.

I don't know if this helps...
Thanks in advance
 
im confused you say you are using projectile motion, however your equation for acceleration has a time dependent variable. this can't be true as the only acceleration on an object in projectile motion is that of gravity which is constant.

would you mind explaining how you got that equation? please
 
Hi lackos,
I got the equation by taking the second derivative of the equaton I formed for the displacement over time of the projectile. I know it has a time dependent variable and this is what is confusing me.
I am beginning to think that I somehow didn't form the displacement over time equation properly. Would you expect the displacement over time equation of a projectile to be a cubic equation, rather than a quadratic?

Thanks
 
TBE said:
I am beginning to think that I somehow didn't form the displacement over time equation properly. Would you expect the displacement over time equation of a projectile to be a cubic equation, rather than a quadratic?

No. The displacement over time equation should be y=y0+v0*t-1/2*g*t^2. Differentiating that twice gives a=-g, which makes perfect sense for gravity.
 
okay I am not sure if this is answering your question, but i hope it does.

when you say "i formed" what do you mean, or better yet what did you do.

also the kinematic equations (which are used in projectile motion) are actually derived by integrating twice from a constant acceleration, with respect to time. this will only give you a quadratic equation for the displacement.
 
If you're doing what I think you're doing, you need to find your total initial velocity. In this case you state it as being 10.80m/s. In order to find the vertical component of the velocity you must use trigonometry. Assuming you are familiar with the basics, here, so correct me if I'm wrong, but imagine a triangle where the vector of your total velocity if the hypotenuse of a triangle. The vertical and horizontal components of this velocity can be found by using the same rules as you would any other triangle, to find the vertical then, sin(x) = opposite/hypotenuse, where x is the angle from the horizontal (ground level) at which you are "firing" your projectile. Opposite is the vertical velocity, and hypotenuse is your total velocity. From this we can say sin(x) = V(vertical)/V(total), rearranging gives us V(Vertical) = V(total)*Sin(x). This is your vertical velocity. The same logic can be applied to find the horizontal velocity component, however replacing sine for cosine, as found from Cosine(x) = Adjacent/Hypotenuse
 
Thanks everyone for your replies.
Ok, I fired a projectile that took 2.46s to go 8.86m. Therefore I plotted the points (0,0) [because at t=0, the displacement was 0m], (1.23,4.43) [because 1.23s is the turning point of the projectile ie v=0, and thus the displacement will be half the total displacement], (2.46,8.86) on a graph. I figured that that the equation should form a cubic, so I formed a cubic equation for displacement over time, then differentiated from there to get the equation for a.
I have not used any of the kinematic equations, so I'm thinking now that that is where I have gone wrong. I have just formed an equation like you would in maths. Looking at the kinematic equations now, I can see that they have been integrated from a constant acceleraton, so I will use them and see what I come up with.
The initial velocity, I just read from the graph when I differentiated it, so if my equations are wrong then that will also be.
Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
804