Projectile Motion and Speed: Solving for Initial Velocity and Height

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a projectile motion problem involving a frog that jumps from a log, landing 2.80 meters away after 2.5 seconds at a 40-degree angle. The initial speed (v0) of the frog was calculated to be 1.4621 m/s, with the vertical component (v0_y) determined as 0.9398 m/s. The height from which the frog jumped was found to be approximately 28.28 meters, although this raised concerns about the realism of the scenario. The calculations were confirmed to be consistent with the provided data, despite the unusual height.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations for motion
  • Basic grasp of gravitational acceleration (9.8 m/s2)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations in projectile motion
  • Learn about the impact of angle on projectile trajectories
  • Explore real-world applications of projectile motion in sports and engineering
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on projectile motion calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of projectile motion.

dano404
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Projectile Motion Problem

Homework Statement


A frog jumps from a log and lands on the ground a distance of 2.80 m away. The frog is airborne for 2.5 seconds, and leaves the log at an angle of 40 degrees. (a) What was the frog's speed (vo) just after it jumped? (b) How high above the ground did the frog jump from?

Homework Equations


The equations I used:
<br /> y = y_0 + v_0_yt - (1/2)g(t^2)<br />
<br /> x = x_0 + v_0_xt<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



First I found that
<br /> v_0_y = v_0sin(40)<br />
and
<br /> v_0_x = v_0cos(40)<br />
Then,
<br /> x = x_0 + v_0_xt<br />
<br /> 2.8 = 0 + (v_0*cos(40))(2.5)<br />
<br /> v_0 = 1.4621 m/s<br />
Now,
<br /> v_0_y = v_0sin(40)<br />
<br /> v_0_y = 1.4621sin(40)<br />
<br /> v_0_y = 0.9398 m/s<br />
Using the first equation,
<br /> y = y_0 + v_0_yt - (1/2)g(t^2)<br />
<br /> 0 = y_0 + (0.9398)(2.5) - (1/2)9.8(2.5^2)<br />
<br /> y_0 = 28.28 m<br />

...Now I really don't think that a frog would be jumping off a 30 meter log. Any ideas at where I'm going wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dano404 said:
First I found that
<br /> v_0_y = v_0sin(40)<br />
and
<br /> v_0_x = v_0cos(40)<br />
Then,
<br /> x = x_0 + v_0_xt<br />
<br /> 2.8 = 0 + (v_0*cos(40))(2.5)<br />
<br /> v_0 = 1.4621 m/s<br />

That looks to be correct.

You could have simply also said that since the horizontal component of velocity stays the same. Distance=Speed*Time.

For the second part. 2.5 seconds is the time for the frog to complete its parabolic motion. Which means that t=2.5 isn't the time at maximum height.
 
Hmmm, I still seem to be getting the same answer.

Using:
<br /> v_y = v_0_y - gt<br />
<br /> 0 = 0.9398 - (9.8)t<br />

I found that it takes roughly 0.06 seconds for the frog to reach the highest point in the jump leaving 2.4 seconds of freefall.

<br /> y = y_0 + v_0_yt - (1/2)gt^2<br />
<br /> 0 = y_0 + (1/2)(9.8)(2.4^2)<br />

Which still gives me a height of about 28m.
 
Whoops...that last post calculated the maximum height reached, not the height at which the little bugger started from. I'm not really sure why I couldn't use 2.5s as the time like I did before.
 
Hi dano404,

dano404 said:
Whoops...that last post calculated the maximum height reached, not the height at which the little bugger started from. I'm not really sure why I couldn't use 2.5s as the time like I did before.

The work in your original post looked okay to me. Was the large height not sounding right? I do understand that a log 30 meters in the air sounds strange, but the numbers they give seem consistent with your answer. Think about the time of flight and what it does to the y velocity. If the frog had just dropped off, after 1 second it would be going about 10 m/s, after 2 seconds it would be traveling about 20m/s, etc., so traveling about 30 m in 2.5 seconds sounds reasonable, I think. (The frog is traveling upwards at the beginning in this problem, but the initial y-velocity is relatively small so these approximate values are still close.)

The poor frog may not enjoy the landing, but collisions are another problem.
 
My professor had accidentally made a typo when writing the problem (on a test from a previous course). He typically tends to make things very realistic which is why I was surprised by the result. Thank you for the responses. I just took my exam, definitely aced it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
62
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K