Projectile Motion and Speed: Solving for Initial Velocity and Height

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a projectile motion problem involving a frog that jumps from a log, landing 2.80 m away after 2.5 seconds at a 40-degree angle. The initial speed of the frog was calculated to be approximately 1.4621 m/s, with a vertical component of about 0.9398 m/s. The height from which the frog jumped was determined to be around 28.28 m, raising concerns about the realism of such a height for a log. Participants noted that while the height seems excessive, the calculations align with the physics of projectile motion. The original poster expressed satisfaction with the problem-solving process, indicating success in their exam.
dano404
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Projectile Motion Problem

Homework Statement


A frog jumps from a log and lands on the ground a distance of 2.80 m away. The frog is airborne for 2.5 seconds, and leaves the log at an angle of 40 degrees. (a) What was the frog's speed (vo) just after it jumped? (b) How high above the ground did the frog jump from?

Homework Equations


The equations I used:
<br /> y = y_0 + v_0_yt - (1/2)g(t^2)<br />
<br /> x = x_0 + v_0_xt<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



First I found that
<br /> v_0_y = v_0sin(40)<br />
and
<br /> v_0_x = v_0cos(40)<br />
Then,
<br /> x = x_0 + v_0_xt<br />
<br /> 2.8 = 0 + (v_0*cos(40))(2.5)<br />
<br /> v_0 = 1.4621 m/s<br />
Now,
<br /> v_0_y = v_0sin(40)<br />
<br /> v_0_y = 1.4621sin(40)<br />
<br /> v_0_y = 0.9398 m/s<br />
Using the first equation,
<br /> y = y_0 + v_0_yt - (1/2)g(t^2)<br />
<br /> 0 = y_0 + (0.9398)(2.5) - (1/2)9.8(2.5^2)<br />
<br /> y_0 = 28.28 m<br />

...Now I really don't think that a frog would be jumping off a 30 meter log. Any ideas at where I'm going wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dano404 said:
First I found that
<br /> v_0_y = v_0sin(40)<br />
and
<br /> v_0_x = v_0cos(40)<br />
Then,
<br /> x = x_0 + v_0_xt<br />
<br /> 2.8 = 0 + (v_0*cos(40))(2.5)<br />
<br /> v_0 = 1.4621 m/s<br />

That looks to be correct.

You could have simply also said that since the horizontal component of velocity stays the same. Distance=Speed*Time.

For the second part. 2.5 seconds is the time for the frog to complete its parabolic motion. Which means that t=2.5 isn't the time at maximum height.
 
Hmmm, I still seem to be getting the same answer.

Using:
<br /> v_y = v_0_y - gt<br />
<br /> 0 = 0.9398 - (9.8)t<br />

I found that it takes roughly 0.06 seconds for the frog to reach the highest point in the jump leaving 2.4 seconds of freefall.

<br /> y = y_0 + v_0_yt - (1/2)gt^2<br />
<br /> 0 = y_0 + (1/2)(9.8)(2.4^2)<br />

Which still gives me a height of about 28m.
 
Whoops...that last post calculated the maximum height reached, not the height at which the little bugger started from. I'm not really sure why I couldn't use 2.5s as the time like I did before.
 
Hi dano404,

dano404 said:
Whoops...that last post calculated the maximum height reached, not the height at which the little bugger started from. I'm not really sure why I couldn't use 2.5s as the time like I did before.

The work in your original post looked okay to me. Was the large height not sounding right? I do understand that a log 30 meters in the air sounds strange, but the numbers they give seem consistent with your answer. Think about the time of flight and what it does to the y velocity. If the frog had just dropped off, after 1 second it would be going about 10 m/s, after 2 seconds it would be traveling about 20m/s, etc., so traveling about 30 m in 2.5 seconds sounds reasonable, I think. (The frog is traveling upwards at the beginning in this problem, but the initial y-velocity is relatively small so these approximate values are still close.)

The poor frog may not enjoy the landing, but collisions are another problem.
 
My professor had accidentally made a typo when writing the problem (on a test from a previous course). He typically tends to make things very realistic which is why I was surprised by the result. Thank you for the responses. I just took my exam, definitely aced it.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
62
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K