Projectile Motion Experimental Error

Click For Summary
The experimental vertical acceleration recorded was -12 m/s^2, deviating from the expected -9.80 m/s^2 for projectile motion. Potential sources of error discussed include air resistance and the weight of the ball, though it is unclear how these would lead to a larger acceleration. The accuracy of measurement tools and calibration methods were also questioned. The user was encouraged to share their y, t data in a machine-readable format for further analysis. Overall, the discussion focused on identifying and addressing possible experimental errors in measuring projectile motion.
ELLE_AW
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I got an experimental vertical acceleration of -12 m/s^2 of projectile motion for an experiment I did at home where I just had to throw a ball at around 45 degree to the horizontal up in the air and record it's motion, then analyze the motion via computer software. Obviously the acceleration I was supposed to get was -9.80m/s^2. I did everything right and all my numbers make sense otherwise, and all my graphs look the way they're supposed to (x vs t graph looks linear) and (y vs t graph looks parabolic). What were some potential sources of error that I may have over-looked?

Homework Equations


acceleration due to gravity = -9.80 m/s^2
projectile motion (neglecting air resistance), should have constant horizontal velocity and it's vertical velocity should have a constant acceleration of -9.80 m/s^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I was thinking air resistance and the weight of the ball, but not sure if that makes sense in terms of giving me a larger acceleration than expected.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is taking the measurements? Do you have a way to calibrate it?
Can you post your y, t data in a machine-readable form (i.e. not as a mere image)?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K