(Projectile motion) Little question on a problem I posted 5 days ago

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a biker launching off an entrenchment at an angle, aiming to land on a higher entrenchment at a specified distance. The original poster seeks to understand why the maximum height of the landing platform must be less than a certain value derived from the projectile's launch parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the geometric implications of the problem, discussing the relationship between the launch angle, distance, and maximum height. There are inquiries about the physical interpretation of the mathematical condition that limits the maximum height of the platform.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided geometric insights and clarified the implications of the mathematical conditions, while others continue to seek a deeper understanding of the physical consequences of the derived inequalities. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to connect the mathematical results with physical realities.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need to interpret the results physically, particularly regarding the implications of obtaining an imaginary number when the maximum height exceeds a certain threshold. Participants are also navigating the constraints of the problem as posed in a homework context.

Lisa...
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
I posted the following problem a few days ago: So it's about somebody on a bike who rides off an entrenchment (that's what it's called right?) with a velocity v under an angle of alpha with the ground. He's hoping to land safely on another entrenchement that's h heigher than the first one, at a distance x from the first entrenchment:
http://img372.imageshack.us/img372/8958/projectilemotion3gj.gif
For a given height h, I found the minimal velocity vmin the jumper needs to have in order to land safely on the platform at a distance x:
v0= (x/cos@) sqrt(g/2(x tan @ -h))

But how can I show that no matter what his takeoff speed is, the maximum height of the platform is hmax < x tan @. I need to interpret this result physically. Well I don't know how to do the last thing, because I know that is hmax < x tan @ the argument under the sqrt will be negative and therefore out of the domain of the sqrt function... I don't see the physical consequences... Could someone please help me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just a geometry problem. If you project a straight line along the lower ramp then that defines the greatest hmax.
 
Could you explain it a little bit more please ... I still don't quite get it... :( sorry
 
Draw a line extending the left ramp in your diagram ... now imagine the right ramp being taller and taller. Eventually, its top corner will be above the line you created. No matter how fast the projectile leaves the left ramp, it will not be able to land safely on the right side!
 
Ok but I need to explain with the formula v0= (x/cos@) sqrt(g/2(x tan @ -h)) why the maximum height of the platform needs to be hmax < x tan @, no matter what the v0 is. This result needs to be interpreted physically... How would I do that?
 
All I know is that if hmax > x tan @ than the argument under the sqrt will be negative and therefore out of the domain of the sqrt function... I don't see the physical consequences...
 
Lisa... said:
All I know is that if hmax > x tan @ than the argument under the sqrt will be negative and therefore out of the domain of the sqrt function... I don't see the physical consequences...
Well, this is correct because it proves that you cannot calculate v_0 when hmax>xtan@

Besides, just look at the triangle you get when i draw a straight line from the left to the right entrenchment, in the direction of v_0. Let us call that distance R.

You get that
1) h = Rsin@
2) x = Rcos@

Devide 1) by 2) and you are done

marlon

ps : vanwaar in Nederland zijt gij en waar studeert ge ?
 
Yeah but what are the physical consequences? (I don't know what they want to hear when they ask for the physical consequences)

ps: Amsterdam
 
Lisa... said:
Yeah but what are the physical consequences? (I don't know what they want to hear when they ask for the physical consequences)
Physical consequences just means that you cannot calculate the velocity in the case of hmax > xtan@. If you cannot calculate the velocity, there is NO MOTION possible because you get an imaginary number. That is all

ps: Amsterdam
Ahh, lang geleden dat ik daar nog geweest ben. Ikzelf woon in Gent , België.

Bedankt voor het antwoord

regards
marlon
 
  • #10
Ohww dat t zo simpel is :P Ik zat er helemaal stuff achter te zoeken. Bedankt in ieder geval voor je antwoord! Succes met je studie!
 
  • #11
Als je nog studeert dan he ;)
 
  • #12
Lisa... said:
Als je nog studeert dan he ;)
ik doctoreer...mmm da is nie echt meer studeren :wink:

marlon
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K