Projectile Motion: Methodology Check

  • Thread starter Thread starter KiNGGeexD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a ball that explodes into two pieces at the peak of its trajectory. The original poster seeks validation of their methodology for determining the velocity of one piece after the explosion, given that one piece drops vertically.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their approach involving the decomposition of velocity into components and the application of momentum conservation. Participants question the clarity of certain terms, such as "drop vertically," and the implications of momentum conservation in the context of the explosion.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, raising questions about the assumptions made and the calculations presented. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of momentum before and after the explosion, and the need for clarity in the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of mass change on momentum calculations and the need for precise definitions of terms used in the problem. The original poster acknowledges potential flaws in their reasoning and is revisiting their calculations.

KiNGGeexD
Messages
317
Reaction score
1
I have another question for you guys:)! I have solved something and I just want to know if my method is ok!A ball of mass m is ejected from a mortar at speed v and angle θ to the horizontal, at the top of its trajectory it explodes into two equal pieces of mass m/2 and one drops vertically what is the velocity of the other right after the explosion?

The first thing I done was components of velocity

v(x)= (vcosθ)
v(y)=(vsinθ)

Then calculated momentum before and made it equal to momentum after as there was no external force so momentum is conserved

Although I used (vcosθ)i+(vsinθ)j

And when cancelling out I got my final answer as

v=gt/2sinθ

Is my methodology correct or should I go about this problem in a different way?:)Cheers guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's not enough information. What does 'drop vertically' mean ? Also your answer should be a vector.
 
KiNGGeexD said:
Then calculated momentum before and made it equal to momentum after as there was no external force so momentum is conserved

Although I used (vcosθ)i+(vsinθ)j
OK, so what was the momentum just before the explosion?

And what was the initial momentum of the piece that "drops" vertically?

And when cancelling out I got my final answer as

v=gt/2sinθ
How did you get this? Why does your answer depend on time?
 
Hold on I've noticed a flaw in my work! I shall get back with an update ASAP:)
 
Ok so the object is falling at g?

So v=g*t

So p(falling)=mgt/2

M/2 as the mass has halfed?
 
KiNGGeexD said:
Ok so the object is falling at g?

So v=g*t

So p(falling)=mgt/2

M/2 as the mass has halfed?
No.

They want the speed immediately after the explosion, not after some time later when it has fallen.
 
Ok so where would I go from the fact that momentum is conserved?
 
KiNGGeexD said:
Ok so where would I go from the fact that momentum is conserved?
Start by answering the two questions I asked in my first post.
 
Ok so I had the momentum before :)

So momentum after would be...

p=mv/2 as would the momentum of the other piece!

So

p(falling)=m(vsinθ) as it has no horizontal component

p(other)=m(vsinθ)+(vcosθ)/2

I missed the unit vectors but I did mean to put them in
 
  • #10
KiNGGeexD said:
Ok so I had the momentum before :)
What is it? Give magnitude and direction.
 
  • #11
p(before)= m((vcosθ)i+(vsinθ)j))
 
  • #12
KiNGGeexD said:
p(before)= m((vcosθ)i+(vsinθ)j))
No. Note that the moment in question is when the ball is at the top of its trajectory, not when it is first launched.
 
  • #13
Ahh ok so then we would just have p(before)=m(vcosθ)i

As at the top of the trajectory y component of velocity is zero?
 
  • #14
KiNGGeexD said:
Ahh ok so then we would just have


p(before)=m(vcosθ)i

As at the top of the trajectory y component of velocity is zero?
Right!

And after the explosion, what is the momentum of the piece that "drops"? (I would assume the "usual" meaning of "drop", though it is somewhat ambiguous.)
 
  • #15
v=tanθ/2
 
  • #16
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1386716315.091743.jpg
 
  • #17
So as a vector v= (vcosθ)i-tanθ/2 j

Although I have not considered the loss of mass for the x component in the above! I know horizontal velocity is constant with constant mass but mass here changes?
 
  • #18
KiNGGeexD said:
v=tanθ/2
Not sure where this comes from. For one thing, the right hand side has no units! So it cannot equal a velocity.

What's the initial velocity of something that is dropped vertically?
 
  • #19
It is zero
 
  • #20
KiNGGeexD said:
It is zero
Right! (That's how I interpret the given information.) So what is its momentum?

And what must be the momentum of the second piece? And thus its velocity?
 
  • #21
Zero lol
 
  • #22
I disregarded momentum for the falling part so if that is the case then the momentum is just the same which doesn't make sense?
 
  • #23
So it's velocity is the same?
 
  • #24
A ball of mass M is ejected from a mortar firework at speed v at an angle θ to the horizontal. At the top of its trajectory, it explodes into two equal pieces of mass M/2. One piece drops vertically.

What is the velocity of the other piece right after the explosion?That's the exact words
 
  • #25
Ok

v=v/2

Which agrees dimensionally and if I think about it if we disregard momentum in the falling piece I should say call it zero rather than disregard it lol!

So
mv(before)=mv/2(after)

So v after just equals v/2??

m(vcosθ)=m(vcosθ)/2

Which is basically the same thing!

This seems far to simple in the context of the problem
 
  • #26
KiNGGeexD said:
Zero lol
Right.

KiNGGeexD said:
I disregarded momentum for the falling part so if that is the case then the momentum is just the same which doesn't make sense?
The momentum of the second piece must equal the total momentum.

KiNGGeexD said:
So it's velocity is the same?
No. Realize that the mass of the second piece is only half the original.
 
  • #27
Ahh ok that sounds reasonable!So like I said above

P(total)=mv(after)/2

So v= 2p/m and the I just put in my total momentum as an equation?
 
  • #28
KiNGGeexD said:
So
mv(before)=mv/2(after)
OK.

So v after just equals v/2??
Careful with that algebra!

m(vcosθ)=m(vcosθ)/2

Which is basically the same thing!
Rewrite that as:
m(vcosθ) = m(vafter)/2

Solve for vafter.
 
  • #29
V(after)=2(vcosθ)Where the v in the RHS is initial?
 
  • #30
KiNGGeexD said:
V(after)=2(vcosθ)


Where the v in the RHS is initial?
Right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K