Electron in a Quantum State: Finding Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding eigenvectors and eigenvalues in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically related to the Hamiltonian operator and its implications for a quantum state of an electron. Participants are examining the correctness of their approaches to a problem involving eigenvalues and eigenvectors, as well as the dependence of certain parameters on the overall multiplicative constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the steps taken to find eigenvalues and eigenvectors, with some questioning the correctness of their calculations and assumptions regarding the dependence of parameters on the constant μ. There is also a focus on the implications of scaling eigenvectors and how it relates to the problem at hand.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the relationships between the parameters involved. Some have recognized potential misunderstandings and are reflecting on their conceptual grasp of the material. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive dialogue is occurring.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics and its mathematical framework, with some expressing uncertainty about their understanding of the concepts introduced in their coursework. The original poster has shared their work and is seeking feedback on specific parts of the problem.

Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


If possible could someone have a look at my working for this problem, I am not sure if I have carried out part b) correctly. I have done all three problem and carried through my solution to b) just to see if it did simplify out, which it didn’t which make me think I may have carried b) out incorrect. I have attached the question as a picture due to the amount of content.

QM1.png


Homework Equations


$$\hat{H}|n\rangle-IE_{n}|n\rangle \:[1]$$
$$P(R)=|\left\langle R|n \right\rangle|^2 \: [2]$$

The Attempt at a Solution


My working for a)
$$|n\rangle=A|n\rangle+B|n\rangle$$
$$|n\rangle=A\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 0\end{pmatrix}+B\begin{pmatrix}0\\ 1\end{pmatrix}$$
$$|n\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}A\\ 0\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\ B\end{pmatrix}$$
$$|n\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}$$
Finding the eingevalue
$$\hat{H}|n\rangle-IE_{n}|n\rangle=0$$
$$\hat{H}-IE_{n}=0$$
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu &-\mu \\ -\mu &2\mu \end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}E_n&0\\ 0&E_n\end{pmatrix}=0$$
Find the Characteristic equation, using the determinate of the matrix below,
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu -E_n&-\mu \\ -\mu &2\mu -E_n\end{pmatrix}=0$$
$$\left(\mu -E_n\right)\left(2\mu -E_n\right)-\mu ^2=0$$
Solving the quartic I get the following roots
$$E_0=\frac{3\mu -\sqrt{5}\mu }{2}\:,\:E_1=\frac{3\mu \:+\sqrt{5}\mu \:}{2}$$

b) finding the eigenvector
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu &-\mu \\ -\mu &2\mu \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}-\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\begin{pmatrix}\mu A\\ \mu B\end{pmatrix}=0$$
Solving the top line
$$\mu A-\mu B-\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\mu A=0$$
I have kept ##\mu## in as it want ##b(\mu)##
if ##A=1## the I get the following
$$|0\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}\mu \\ \left(\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\mu \end{pmatrix}$$
I am going to ommit the normalising constants as they will cancel through, as they are the same, and as stated not need for this part of the problem.
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu \\ \left(\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\mu \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \frac{1}{2}-b\end{pmatrix}$$
I do think this is wrong because I really can't understand why the above works, I understanding the if you scale and eignevector not matter what, the eigenvalue will still be the same, but, I can't see how the above is correct as in this case ##\mu=1## anyway carring on solving through I get the following for b.
$$b(\mu)=\frac{1}{2}+\left(\frac{\left(1-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu }{2}\right)$$

this gave me the new ground state vector
$$|0\rangle = N_0\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\left(1-\sqrt{5}\right)}{2}\end{pmatrix}=N_0\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \left(\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}\mu \right)\end{pmatrix}$$

c) assuming that ##b(\mu)## is correct I then did the following
$$\langle 0|0 \rangle=N_{0}^2(|L\rangle + \frac{\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)}{2}\mu|R\rangle)(\langle L| + \frac{\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)}{2}\mu\langle R|)$$
So multiplying out a ##\langle 0|0 \rangle=1## I make ##N_0=\sqrt{\frac{2}{2+\left(3-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^2}}##

So now find find the probability I did the following first I found
$$\langle R|0\rangle=\sqrt{\frac{2}{2+\left(3-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^2}}\left(\frac{\left(3-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^2}{2}\right)$$

Using equation [2] I found the probability for the electron to be in the right to be
$$P(R)=\frac{\left(14-6\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^{4\:}}{4+2\left(3-\sqrt{5}\right)\mu ^2}$$

As I have stated I am not really sure if my b is correct, but can't really see any other way of making it a constant function
 

Attachments

  • QM1.png
    QM1.png
    59.1 KB · Views: 594
Physics news on Phys.org
OK for part (a). For part (b), I think you've been thrown off course by the statement of the problem which implies that the parameter b will be a function of μ. Note the form of the Hamiltonian. μ is just an overall multiplicative constant. So, should the eigenvectors of H depend on μ?
 
No, I don’t think so because the of the fact alls you effectively is extending the vector in the direction it already going in. I originally thought this but then beacuse the question stated it as a function I was not sure.
 
Taylor_1989 said:
b) finding the eigenvector
$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu &-\mu \\ -\mu &2\mu \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}-\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\begin{pmatrix}\mu A\\ \mu B\end{pmatrix}=0$$
Solving the top line
$$\mu A-\mu B-\left(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)\mu A=0$$
Since ##\mu## cancels out in this equation, ##A## and ##B## do not depend on ##\mu##. So, ##b## will not depend on ##\mu##.
 
Thank for the response, I have realized what going on, I did cancel through originally and just had the value. But for some reason I seem to think when it comes to quantum physics "maybe this could be true" and forget the basics of maths, in part iv only just been introduced this year so I am still trying to wrap my head around more the concepts that anything, I have started going through Griffith which seem to be a very good book for the concepts, so hopefully I won't make silly mistakes like this again. Once again much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K