Projectile Motion: Safe Distances from Enemy Ship

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion, specifically determining safe distances from an enemy ship that can fire projectiles at a mountain peak. The ship's position relative to the peak and the initial speed of the projectiles are key factors in the discussion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to determine the safe distances, including the use of angles and projectile equations. There is uncertainty about the ship's ability to move and how that affects the calculations. Some participants question the necessity of including angles in their equations and explore the implications of launching angles on the projectile's trajectory.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and results. Some have derived potential ranges for safety, while others express confusion about the methods used and seek clarification. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answers yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem's setup, including the height of the mountain and the distance from the ship. There are also discussions about the assumptions regarding the ship's movement and the projectile's path relative to the mountain peak.

blackboy
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An enemy ship is on the western side of a mountain island. The enemy ship can maneuver to within 2500 m of the 1800 m high mountain peak and can shoot projectiles with an initial speed of 250m/s. If the eastern shore line is horizontally 300m from the peak, what are the distances from the eastern shore at which a shop can be safe from the bombardment of the enemy ship?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I got what ranges you could be farther away than or x>3577.55, but I can't find a way to get the x< part. I have y=Tanθx-gx²/(125000Cos²θ). And I made an inequality where y>1800. I don't think this is the right approach though. Also I am not sure if the ship can move back or not. If it can't please tell me and then I would know how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi blackboy! :smile:
blackboy said:
Also I am not sure if the ship can move back or not.

The shop moves but the ship doesn't. :wink:

(if i'd written the question, the projectiles would have been sheep. :rolleyes:)
I got what ranges you could be farther away than or x>3577.55, but I can't find a way to get the x< part. I have y=Tanθx-gx²/(125000Cos²θ). And I made an inequality where y>1800. I don't think this is the right approach though.

Why do you still have θ in your equations?

The x and y equations should have cosθ and sinθ, but then you should eliminate θ (squaring and adding usually works).

Show us what you get. :smile:
 
You could try this approach:

The projectile needs to clear the peak. Consider the peak to be a point on the left-hand side of the "initial" parabola and see at what angle it should be launched to pass through it. Try and figure out what will happen if is launched at higher elevations, that is will it clear the peak? This will happen if the centre of the "initial" parabola is to the right of the peak.

The closest that the shot can get is when the peak is a point on the right-hand side of the parabola isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Ok so then can't I solve for θ in my quadratic if I make everything in terms of Tanθ and have that parabola going through the point 2500,1800?
 
el … I am … in … ate !

blackboy said:
Ok so then can't I solve for θ in my quadratic if I make everything in terms of Tanθ and have that parabola going through the point 2500,1800?

Yes, you could …

but why bother when the question doesn't ask for θ …

don't try to understand the little varmint :rolleyes:

just eliminate it! :biggrin:

(oh … and that'ld only give you the angle to hit the shop if it's on the edge of the cliff :wink:)
 
blackboy said:
Ok so then can't I solve for θ in my quadratic if I make everything in terms of Tanθ and have that parabola going through the point 2500,1800?

Yes, that will give you the two launching angles and their subsequent ranges. The larger angle gives the smaller range since the projectile passes through the point on its way down and the smaller angle gives the larger range since it passes the point on its way up.
 
I got my answer with the solving for the angle way. x>3480 or x<270. Tiny Tim I don't understand your method, can you please explain?
 
blackboy said:
I got my answer with the solving for the angle way. x>3480 or x<270. Tiny Tim I don't understand your method, can you please explain?

Your answers don't seem right to me. If I work backwards from them I get that the projectile will be at a height of 1262 m for your x = 3480 m (theta = 40,0 degrees) and 119 m for your x = 270 m (theta = 14,4 degrees) at the position of the peak?
 
The angles I got were 50.1 and 75.6. The ranges were then respectively 6280 and 3070. Then subtracting 2800 I got 3480 and 270. Also can you tell me why you we want the parabola going through 2500,1800? I would imagine we could get closer to the eastern shore if we got a higher angle?
 
  • #10
Yes, the range would be less but the projectile will hit the mountain. That is the axis of the parabola is on the western side of the mountain. Launching at a higher elevation shifts it even further westwards causing the projectile to pass the peak at a lower height, and crashing into the mountain. Try it, calculate y(2500) for a slightly larger angle.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K