Projectile Motion Velocity Question

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height a skateboarder reaches after leaving a slanted track at a velocity of 5.4 m/s. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct equations for projectile motion, particularly noting that acceleration due to gravity should be negative. The initial vertical velocity was calculated as 4.01 m/s, and the equation v(final)^2 = v(init)^2 + 2as is suggested for finding the maximum height. There is a focus on ensuring the height calculated is above the end of the track without needing to adjust for the initial height of 0.4 m. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the correct approach and the expected answer to resolve any confusion.
Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
The drawing shows a skateboarder moving at 5.4 m/s along a horizontal section of a track that is slanted upward by 48° above the horizontal at its end, which is 0.4 m above the ground. When she leaves the track, she follows the characteristic path of projectile motion. Ignoring friction and air resistance, find the maximum height H to whioch she rises above the end of the track.

I have tried again and again to do this question but it will not work.

Found initial velocity in the y direction - 4.01.

Then I just substituted these values into the equation: v2 = u2 + 2as.

I got 0.832.

I subtracted this from 0.4 and got about 0.42m. Wrong, wrong, wrong, that was.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
good news, you correctly identified the initial velocity in the y direction.

don't forget that acceleration in your equation is negative g, because gravity is slowing down the object.

Your maximum height will be the moment that v(final) = 0, so...

v(final)^2 = v(init)^2 + 2as
0^2 = 4.01^2 + 2(-9.8)s

solve for s, and don't forget to add that to your initial height when you leave the ramp, and you will have your answer
 
I got 0.42 (approximately) but that doesn't seem like the right technique. Any other ideas on how to tackle this question?

I have tried using PE and KE to figure this out but I get the same answer.
 
Since the question asks you to
Procrastinate said:
find the maximum height H to which she rises above the end of the track.
and states
Procrastinate said:
When she leaves the track, she follows the characteristic path of projectile motion.
you can use either the constant acceleration formulas both you and EinsteinKillr stated, or the energy formula you stated. Both will work in this case. The important thing to realize here, is that they are asking for the height above the end of the track, so you won't need to add or subtract anything from the height you get from either of those techniques.

If these techniques don't seem correct to you, might you state why? Also if you have the given answer, stating what it is might help identify which technique needs to be used.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K