Projectile Motion with initial velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving an initial velocity at an angle and determining the time when the projectile's velocity becomes perpendicular to its original velocity. Participants explore the mathematical relationships and vector components involved in this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the dot product of velocity vectors to determine orthogonality, with some questioning the correctness of their expressions and assumptions about angles. There are attempts to clarify the inner product and its implications for the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on vector approaches and the inner product concept. Some have identified mistakes in their reasoning, while others are exploring the implications of their findings. There is a recognition of special cases, such as purely vertical motion, but no consensus has been reached on the general case.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of adhering to forum rules regarding the posting of complete solutions, and there is an acknowledgment of potential constraints in the problem setup, such as the angle of projection and its effects on the outcome.

Yashbhatt
Messages
348
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


A projectile with initial velocity u making an angle A with the horizontal. Find the time t when the velocity of the projectile becomes perpendicular to its original velocity.

Homework Equations


v = u + at
s = ut + 1/2at^2
v^2 - u^2 = 2as[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I have an intuitive idea of how to solve it. When the velocity becomes perpendicular to the original velocity, their dot product will be zero. I don't know if this is the right way. If this the right way, I don't know how to solve for it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That indeed sounds like a good approach. So how can you realize your idea? What is the velocity vector at a given time?
 
It's the vector sum of v(y) = u sinA - gt and v(x) = u cosA
 
Indeed. So what is the inner product of that vector at ##t=0## with that vector at ##t=T##?
 
That's were the problem is. I got it as the square root of v^2 - 2 u g t sinA + g^2 t^2. I don't know what to do further.
 
That looks as the square root of the actual inner product (assuming the v^2 should be u^2), but it should be zero anyway so this does not matter much.

So, do you know how to solve for the roots of a second order polynomial?
 
Through the Discriminant?
 
The discriminant gives you some information on the nature of the roots. Let us take something more hands on: If
$$
x^2 + px + q = 0,
$$
what is ##x##?
 
Sorry, I am not thinking straight. The expression you have is not the inner product but the speed at time t. How is the inner product of two vectors defined?
 
  • #10
Mod note: I have deleted the content of this post, as it was a complete solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
just realized i have made the mistake of not making B negative (since the velocity should be downwards)

so the expression should be t=(u/gsinA)
 
  • #12
throneoo said:
Let B be the angle of velocity in mid-air with respect to the horizon, such that the velocity is perpendicular to its original velocity.

A=pi/2-B

This expression is not correct as it gives A+B = pi/2 which is not equivalent to orthogonality. Also, note that forum rules forbids posting full solutions until the OP has solved the problem.
 
  • #13
doesn't that make the angle between the velocities orthogonal?
 
  • #14
vector approach:
u.v=0

(ucosA i + usinA j).(vcos(-B) i + vsin(-B) j )=0

(ucosA i + usinA j).(ucos(A) i + (usinA-gt) j )=0
 
  • #15
No, in order to be orthogonal you would need A-B = pi/2. That B is negative is being taken care of automatically by the vector component.
 
  • #16
Orodruin said:
No, in order to be orthogonal you would need A-B = pi/2. That B is negative is being taken care of automatically by the vector component.

yup I realized that mistake
 
  • #17
throneoo said:
A)

I used this but got an expression I couldn't solve.
 
  • #18
throneoo said:
vector approach:
u.v=0

(ucosA i + usinA j).(vcos(-B) i + vsin(-B) j )=0

(ucosA i + usinA j).(ucos(A) i + (usinA-gt) j )=0

I used this, but could not solve the expression I got.
 
  • #19
If you do the inner product equal to zero approach you should get a linear expression in t. It should be a simple matter of solving this.

Note that what you had earlier was not the inner product of the velocity at t and that at time 0, but the speed at time t. That will never be zero unless the horizontal component is.
 
  • #20
(ucosA i + usinA j).(ucos(A) i + (usinA-gt) j )=0

I have to this, right?
 
  • #21
Yes, so what do you get when you do that?
 
  • #22
Yashbhatt said:
(ucosA i + usinA j).(ucos(A) i + (usinA-gt) j )=0

I have to this, right?
 
  • #23
I got u/g sin A. Is that correct?
 
  • #24
Yashbhatt said:
I got u/g sin A. Is that correct?

Yes. The inner product becomes
$$
\vec v(0) \cdot \vec v(t) = u^2 - ugt\sin\theta = 0.
$$
Solving for ##t## gives the answer you just gave.

Note that there is no solution if ##\theta=0## and that the solution for ##\theta<0## is negative, meaning that this would have occurred earlier along the parabola and will not occur after the release.

Edit: Another special case is when ##\sin\theta = 1##, i.e., the motion is purely vertical. Can you explain the result for this case?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Yashbhatt
  • #25
I actually discussed this with my friend. That would give you u/g i.e. the highest point. At the highest point, the velocity will be a null vector. So, we can take it as perpendicular to the g vector.

Is that correct?
 
  • #26
Yes, if the motion is purely vertical, then the velocity on top is zero and the time to get there is just the time u/g which is how long it takes to decelerate u to 0 with deceleration g. The inner product of the zero vector with anything is zero so it is orthogonal to everything.
 
  • #27
Okay. Got it. Thanks for helping.

Can we find this for any arbitrary angle A?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K