Projectile Problem: Solving for θ=60° | Sinθ = ±√3 Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter AakashPandita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem, specifically focusing on the angle θ and its relationship with the sine function. Participants are examining the correctness of equations related to the height and energy conservation in projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of the original equations presented, particularly the expression for height and the use of conservation of energy. There are discussions about the correct formulation of velocity components and the implications of different approaches to the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants challenging each other's equations and reasoning. Some guidance is being offered regarding the interpretation of energy conservation, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or equations at this stage.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of kinematic equations and energy conservation principles, with participants expressing differing views on the setup and assumptions of the problem.

AakashPandita
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
See the attachment.

The right answer is θ=60 degrees

but i am getting sinθ = ±√3.
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 423
Physics news on Phys.org
AakashPandita said:
See the attachment.

The right answer is θ=60 degrees

but i am getting sinθ = ±√3.

Your expression for ##v_y## is wrong.

Also, check your last step when you plug 3 in 4.
 
Last edited:
I don't agree with your very first equation. It is not true that
[tex]H= \frac{u^{2} \sin^{2}( \theta)}{2g}.[/tex]
Conservation of Energy requires, instead, that
[tex]mgH+ \frac{m u^{2} \cos^{2}( \theta)}{2}= \frac{mu^{2}}{2},[/tex]
comparing the peak to the starting-point, or
[tex]gH+ \frac{u^{2} \cos^{2}( \theta)}{2}= \frac{u^{2}}{2}.[/tex]
Then you can also write
[tex]\frac{gH}{2}+ \frac{5 u^{2} \cos^{2}( \theta)}{4}= \frac{u^{2}}{2},[/tex]
comparing the energies at the half-way point to the starting-point.
 
First things first.

How is my expression for vy wrong?

I used v2-u2 = 2as
 
AakashPandita said:
First things first.

How is my expression for vy wrong?

I used v2-u2 = 2as

What are the directions for velocity in vertical direction and acceleration?
 
Ackbeet said:
I don't agree with your very first equation. It is not true that
[tex]H= \frac{u^{2} \sin^{2}( \theta)}{2g}.[/tex]
Conservation of Energy requires, instead, that
[tex]mgH+ \frac{m u^{2} \cos^{2}( \theta)}{2}= \frac{mu^{2}}{2},[/tex]
Doesn't that reduce to the same equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
haruspex said:
Doesn't that reduce to the same equation?

You're quite right. Chalk that one up to needing to do one step at a time. Also, for the half-way point, it doesn't reduce the same way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K