Projectile question — Cannonball fired over a hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter dyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Projectile
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a cannonball fired over a hill, specifically addressing the time of flight, trajectory shape, and the required initial velocity for different launch angles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the angle of launch and the trajectory, questioning the use of right-angle triangles for a parabolic path. They also discuss the implications of launching at different angles and the necessary initial velocity to achieve a specific height.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify misconceptions about the trajectory shape and the relationship between vertical and horizontal components of motion. Some participants suggest alternative approaches to determine the initial velocity needed for different launch angles, while others express uncertainty about their calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for solving the problem accurately. There is an emphasis on understanding the physics concepts rather than arriving at a definitive solution.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Homework Statement
A 130m high hill is located halfway between the cannon and its target. If the cannonball is fired at an elevation angle of 30 degrees and just clears the hill to strike the target , calculate the initial velocity and the distance from the cannon to the target
Relevant Equations
Time of flight , t= 2v sin(theta) /g where v is the initial speed and theta is the elevation angle
Time of flight is t = 2v sinθ /g = v/g for θ = π/6 so time to top of flight is t = v/(2g)

I then constructed a right-angle triangle with θ=π/6 and opposite side of 130m and used tangent to get the adjacent side , ie. distance from cannon to hill to be 225.17m
The horizontal velocity is v cosθ which is 0.866v. Using speed = distance /time I equated 0.866v to 225.17/ {v/(2g)} to get an equation for v squared which gives a final answer of v = 71.42 m/s and distance from cannon to target is 2 x 225.17 = 450.34 m

These are not the right answers but I have no idea why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mistake is here:
dyn said:
I then constructed a right-angle triangle with θ=π/6 and opposite side of 130m and used tangent to get the adjacent side , ie. distance from cannon to hill to be 225.17m
Make a sketch in which you draw the trajectory of the cannonball from the cannon to the top of the hill. (What is the shape of the trajectory?) Then draw a straight line from the cannon to the top of the hill. Does the straight line make a 30o angle to the horizontal?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Thanks for your reply. The trajectory is a parabola so I can't use the right angle triangle
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
Try this approach: you are told the highest vertical distance of the projectile. How long would it take to reach this height?
 
dyn said:
Thanks for your reply. The trajectory is a parabola so I can't use the right angle triangle
What the initial velocity should be if the cannon is pointed perfectly vertical and you want the cannonball to reach the height of 130 meters only?
Then, if you tilt the cannon to an elevation angle of 30 degrees, trying to cover the horizontal distance to the target, still clearing the hill, should the initial velocity be greater than the one previously calculated for vertical shooting?
If so, how much it and its horizontal component should be?
 
Thanks everyone. I got it right now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
43K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K