Proof about 2 numbers being relatively prime.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that there are an infinite number of primes by examining a series of numbers defined as 2 raised to powers of 2, plus 1. Participants are exploring the properties of these numbers, particularly their relative primality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss examining the differences between pairs of numbers in the series to identify common factors. There are attempts to generalize the proof by considering the properties of Fermat numbers and their relationships.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants suggest looking at specific differences and properties of the numbers, while others question the effectiveness of these arguments. A reference to a known recursion relation for Fermat numbers has been introduced as a potential pathway for further exploration.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of Fermat numbers and a specific recursion relation that may guide the proof. Participants are also considering the implications of divisibility and relative primality in their arguments.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Prove that their are an infinite amount of primes by observing that in the series
2^2+1, 2^{2^2}+1,2^{2^3}+1,2^{2^4}+1,...
every 2 numbers are relatively prime.

The Attempt at a Solution


I was going to take 2 of the numbers in the series and look at their difference because if they have common factors then it should divide their difference, but then I am not sure how this will work.
or maybe I should look at these numbers mod2 or something, well I guess mod2 these all equal 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
I was going to take 2 of the numbers in the series and look at their difference
Seems a good start. Suppose p divides each, so it divide the difference. Can you then discard a factor of the difference and deduce that p divides the remaining factor?
 
If I look at 2^4+1-(2^2+1)=2^4-2^2=2^2(2^2-1) we know that
2^2+1 and 2^2-1 are relatively prime because they are an odd number separated by a power of 2. But then I was trying to generalize this proof. where we have
2^x+1,2^y+1 x<y then 2^y+1-2^x-1=2^x(2^{y-x}-1 I guess I could make a similar argument that 2^{y-x}-1 and 2^x+1 are relatively prime.
 
cragar said:
2^y+1-2^x-1=2^x(2^{y-x}-1 I guess I could make a similar argument that 2^{y-x}-1 and 2^x+1 are relatively prime.
I don't think that argument will work.
As I said, suppose p divides 22x+1 and 22y+1, so it follows that p divides 22y-2x-1. Can you now construct more numbers it must divide?
 
These numbers are called Fermat numbers. Define F(n)=2^(2^n)+1. Then if you can show the recursion relation F(n)=F(n-1)F(n-2)...F(1)F(0)+2, you are pretty much home free. Try concentrating on proving that. That's the usual route. Start by writing down the most obvious relation between F(n) and F(n-1) that you can think of.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K