Prove there are infinitely many primes using Mersenne Primes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the attempt to prove the infinitude of primes using Mersenne primes, defined as M = 2k - 1. The initial lemma proposed that if k is prime, then M is also prime; however, this lemma was ultimately deemed false, as demonstrated by the counterexample of k = 11. The conclusion drawn is that it is not possible to prove the existence of infinitely many primes solely through Mersenne primes, as the primality of k does not guarantee the primality of M.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with Mersenne primes and their definition
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs and counterexamples
  • Experience with number theory concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Mersenne primes in depth
  • Learn about the relationship between prime numbers and composite numbers
  • Explore alternative proofs of the infinitude of primes, such as Euclid's proof
  • Investigate the current research on the distribution of Mersenne primes
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of prime numbers and Mersenne primes.

Kitty Kat
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that there are infinitely many primes using Mersenne Primes, or show that it cannot be proven with Mersenne Primes.

Homework Equations


A Mersenne prime has the form: M = 2k - 1

The Attempt at a Solution


Lemma: If k is a prime, then M = 2k - 1 is a prime.
Proof of Lemma: Assume that k is composite, then 2k - 1 must also be composite.
k = a * b
2ab - 1 is then divisible by both (2a - 1) and (2b - 1)
Therefore k must be a prime.

Proof for problem

Assume there are finitely many primes, p1, ... , pr, and let pr be the last prime.

Then by Lemma 1, 2pr - 1 is a Mersenne prime, which is certainly larger than pr, therefore there are infinitely many primes.
After writing all this out, I realized that the lemma is most certainly false, so I guess there isn't a way to prove infinitely many primes with Mersenne Primes, since the number of Mersenne Primes themselves are an open question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You appear to think you have proved that if ##k## is prime, then ##2^k -1## is prime. This is false. E.g ##k = 11##

You have proved the converse: If ##2^k -1## is prime, then ##k## is prime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kitty Kat

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K