Proof about arithmetic progressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the existence of arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions of distinct positive integers where every two terms are relatively prime. Initial thoughts included using odd numbers separated by powers of 2, but this approach was deemed inadequate. A viable solution was proposed using the progression 1+n!, 1+2n!, 1+3n!, ..., 1+n!n, which maintains relative primality due to the structure of factorials. The conversation emphasizes that for any given length N, a longer progression can be constructed. Ultimately, the conclusion affirms the possibility of such progressions while avoiding common divisors among the terms.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Prove that there exist arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions formed of different
positive integers such that every two terms of these progressions are relatively prime.

The Attempt at a Solution


I first thought of looking at odd numbers separated by a powers of 2 but I don't think this forms a progression.
It seems weird to me because if I have a+bx where a and b are fixed constants so I am adding
a multiple of x eventually x will equal a and then 2a so they won't be relatively prime.
unless its like how we can have arbitrarily long composite numbers because of n!+2...n!+n
then I could just maybe add a multiple of the prime between n! and 2n!.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems weird to me because if I have a+bx where a and b are fixed constants so I am adding
a multiple of x eventually x will equal a and then 2a so they won't be relatively prime.
Right, and the conclusion is that no infinite arithmetic progression with that property can exist.
If you want to avoid a common divisor of 2 for an arbitrary progression length, how can you do that? (You found the answer already)
If you want to avoid a common divisor of 3 for an arbitrary progression length, how can you do that? In particular, what can you say about b?
... generalize to all primes.
 
Yes, you have to read the question aright. It's not saying there exists a progression that is arbitrarily long, but that for any given N you can find a progression longer than N.
 
ok so I guess I could use this progression 1+n!,1+2n!,1+3n!,...1+(n)n!,
all of these are relatively prime because if i take an two term in this progression and look at their
difference rn!+1-(kn!+1) where k<r<n+1 then i get n!(r-k) and (r-k)<n and none of these terms are divisible
by any of the prime factors of n! or r-k.
 
That is the right answer.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K