Proof about arithmetic progressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Prove that there exist arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions formed of different positive integers such that every 2 terms of these progressions are relatively prime.

The Attempt at a Solution


First i started to think about the odd integers like 2x+1 and how consecutive odd integers are relatively prime because their difference is 2 , but I am pretty sure the question is asking about any 2 terms in the progression. Then i started to think about progressions of odd numbers that were separated by powers of 2 but then this would be a progression because the difference between consecutive numbers would not be the same. Then I was trying to think of something i could do with a factorial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok thanks for the hint haruspex, I think n!x+1 will work where x=1,2,3... and n is a natural number as large as you like. if we look at the difference between any 2 of the terms in the progression.
like n!(x+a)+1-(n!x+1) =n!a where n>x+a , if n!(x+a)+1 and n!x+1 had common factors then it should divide their difference but their difference is n!a, and none of those factors divide n!x+1 because their would be a remainder because n! contains all the factors 1 up to n.
 
cragar said:
ok thanks for the hint haruspex, I think n!x+1 will work where x=1,2,3... and n is a natural number as large as you like. if we look at the difference between any 2 of the terms in the progression.
like n!(x+a)+1-(n!x+1) =n!a where n>x+a , if n!(x+a)+1 and n!x+1 had common factors then it should divide their difference but their difference is n!a, and none of those factors divide n!x+1 because their would be a remainder because n! contains all the factors 1 up to n.
Glad that worked - seemed like it should but I hadn't checked the details.