Proof about arithmetic progressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the existence of arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions of different positive integers where every two terms are relatively prime. The original poster explores various approaches to construct such progressions and questions the implications of their definitions and assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers using odd numbers separated by powers of 2 but doubts its validity for forming a progression. They also reference the construction of composite numbers to suggest a potential method for forming the desired progression. Other participants question how to avoid common divisors in the context of arithmetic progressions and suggest generalizing the approach to all primes.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different interpretations of the problem and discussing potential constructions for the arithmetic progression. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the progressions and the conditions necessary to maintain the property of being relatively prime.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the distinction between finding a single long progression versus proving the existence of longer progressions for any given length N. The discussion also touches on the implications of common divisors in the context of the arithmetic sequences being considered.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Prove that there exist arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions formed of different
positive integers such that every two terms of these progressions are relatively prime.

The Attempt at a Solution


I first thought of looking at odd numbers separated by a powers of 2 but I don't think this forms a progression.
It seems weird to me because if I have a+bx where a and b are fixed constants so I am adding
a multiple of x eventually x will equal a and then 2a so they won't be relatively prime.
unless its like how we can have arbitrarily long composite numbers because of n!+2...n!+n
then I could just maybe add a multiple of the prime between n! and 2n!.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems weird to me because if I have a+bx where a and b are fixed constants so I am adding
a multiple of x eventually x will equal a and then 2a so they won't be relatively prime.
Right, and the conclusion is that no infinite arithmetic progression with that property can exist.
If you want to avoid a common divisor of 2 for an arbitrary progression length, how can you do that? (You found the answer already)
If you want to avoid a common divisor of 3 for an arbitrary progression length, how can you do that? In particular, what can you say about b?
... generalize to all primes.
 
Yes, you have to read the question aright. It's not saying there exists a progression that is arbitrarily long, but that for any given N you can find a progression longer than N.
 
ok so I guess I could use this progression 1+n!,1+2n!,1+3n!,...1+(n)n!,
all of these are relatively prime because if i take an two term in this progression and look at their
difference rn!+1-(kn!+1) where k<r<n+1 then i get n!(r-k) and (r-k)<n and none of these terms are divisible
by any of the prime factors of n! or r-k.
 
That is the right answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K