Proof about irrational numbers.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that \(\sqrt{6}\) is irrational using proof by contradiction. Participants suggest assuming \(\sqrt{6}\) is rational, leading to the equation \(6q^2 = p^2\), which implies both \(p\) and \(q\) are even, creating a contradiction due to common factors. Additionally, the idea that the product of two different irrational numbers is irrational is debated, with counterexamples provided. The conclusion emphasizes the validity of the proof by contradiction method for establishing the irrationality of \(\sqrt{6}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of proof by contradiction
  • Familiarity with rational and irrational numbers
  • Basic knowledge of prime factorization
  • Experience with square roots and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof by contradiction technique in depth
  • Explore the properties of irrational numbers and their products
  • Learn about prime factorization and its role in number theory
  • Investigate other proofs of irrationality, such as for \(\sqrt{2}\) and \(\sqrt{3}\)
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory and proofs of irrationality will benefit from this discussion.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Prove that \sqrt{6} is irrational.

The Attempt at a Solution



Would I just do a proof by contradiction and assume that \sqrt{6} is rational and then get that 6q^2=p^2 which would imply that p is even so I put in p=2r
and then multiply it out. then this would imply that q is also even and this is a contradiction because they would have factors in common. I know I skipped some of the steps. Could I also make an argument that \sqrt{6} is \sqrt{3}\sqrt{2} and then say that an irrational times an irrational is an irrational as long as its not the same irrational.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
Would I just do a proof by contradiction and assume that \sqrt{6} is rational and then get that 6q^2=p^2 which would imply that p is even so I put in p=2r
and then multiply it out. then this would imply that q is also even and this is a contradiction because they would have factors in common. I know I skipped some of the steps.

Sounds good.

Could I also make an argument that \sqrt{6} is \sqrt{3}\sqrt{2} and then say that an irrational times an irrational is an irrational as long as its not the same irrational.

Uuh, that isn't true. There are many counterexamples.
 
ok thanks for your response. on the second one I can't think of a counterexample off hand. maybe i should think about it more.
 
cragar said:
ok thanks for your response. on the second one I can't think of a counterexample off hand. maybe i should think about it more.

\sqrt[3]{4}*\sqrt[3]{2}

or

\sqrt{2}*\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}

or

\sqrt{18}*\sqrt{2}
 
cragar said:
ok thanks for your response. on the second one I can't think of a counterexample off hand. maybe i should think about it more.

\sqrt{81} = \sqrt[]{3}\sqrt[]{27}

Damn you Micro you're too quick.
 
ya but all the counterexample have common factors under the radical. I was saying that there, well I was thinking that there were no common factors under the radical.
What if i said a prime number that is square rooted times a different prime that is square rooted will be irrational.
 
rollcast said:
\sqrt{81} = \sqrt[]{3}\sqrt[]{27}

Damn you Micro you're too quick.

Ya snooze, you lose! :biggrin:

cragar said:
ya but all the counterexample have common factors under the radical. I was saying that there, well I was thinking that there were no common factors under the radical.

Then the statement is probably true. But did you prove the statement??
 
Okay tell me if this works. let's assume we have a multiplication of primes to the nth root.
and let's assume that it is rational and that they have no common factors .
(P_1P_2P_3...P_r)^{\frac{1}{n}}=\frac{x}{y}
then we take both sides to then power of n and then multiply the y^n over
and we get y^n(P_1P_2P_3...P_r)=x^n
therefor this implies that x^n is divisible by a prime. so we will now write x=aP
and we get that y^n(P_1P_2P_3...P_r)=(aP)^n
and this would imply that y is divisible by some prime in our list. and this would imply that x and y share a common factor which is a contradiction.
not sure if my last line of reasoning is valid.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K