The basis of the Real numbers over the Irrationals

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dimension of the basis of the real numbers over the irrationals, with participants exploring the nature of this relationship and the implications of vector space properties.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of the original poster's assertion that the basis is infinite, discussing the implications of irrationals not forming a vector subspace of the reals. There are inquiries about how to prove certain properties and whether specific mathematical axioms are violated.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants offering insights into the properties of vector spaces and questioning the assumptions made about irrationals. Some guidance has been provided regarding the closure properties required for a set to be a vector space.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the nature of the irrationals and their role in vector spaces, with participants discussing the implications of operations involving irrationals and rationals.

nautolian
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
1. What can be said of the dimension of the basis of the Reals over the Irrationals
2. Homework Equations
3. I believe the basis is infinite because any real number can be made out of the combination of irrational vectors multiplied by the same irrational coefficient to make any real number. ie. sqrt(2)*sqrt(2)=2 + sqrt(51)*sqrt(51)=53, etc. Could you please help me figure out if this is the correct solution or what a better way to phrase the proof would be? Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
nautolian said:
1. What can be said of the dimension of the basis of the Reals over the Irrationals



Homework Equations





3. I believe the basis is infinite because any real number can be made out of the combination of irrational vectors multiplied by the same irrational coefficient to make any real number. ie. sqrt(2)*sqrt(2)=2 + sqrt(51)*sqrt(51)=53, etc. Could you please help me figure out if this is the correct solution or what a better way to phrase the proof would be? Thanks!

The irrationals aren't a vector subspace of R, so the question is pretty meaningless. Did you maybe mean the rationals?
 
Actually, I think it's a trick question because I thought that at first but I wasn't sure. How would I prove that? Does it break the multiply by zero axium since zero is not an irrational? Thanks for your help!
 
nautolian said:
Actually, I think it's a trick question because I thought that at first but I wasn't sure. How would I prove that? Does it break the multiply by zero axium since zero is not an irrational? Thanks for your help!

It sure does. 0 is not an irrational. Lot's of other things break. You can also add two irrationals and get a rational etc etc.
 
Hey thanks, how would adding two irrationals to get a rational break the vector space rule?
 
nautolian said:
Hey thanks, how would adding two irrationals to get a rational break the vector space rule?

To be a vector space you first have to be an additive group. The addition operation has to be closed. I.e. if x and y are irrational then x+y has to be irrational. Give a counterexample.
 
nautolian said:
1. What can be said of the dimension of the basis of the Reals over the Irrationals



2. Homework Equations



3. I believe the basis is infinite because any real number can be made out of the combination of irrational vectors multiplied by the same irrational coefficient to make any real number. ie. sqrt(2)*sqrt(2)=2 + sqrt(51)*sqrt(51)=53, etc.
What are you doing here? √2 + √2 = 2, and 2 + √51 + √51 = 53, but in connecting expressions as you did above, you are saying that 2 = 53, which is clearly not true.
nautolian said:
Could you please help me figure out if this is the correct solution or what a better way to phrase the proof would be? Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K