Proof about isomorphism (Graph Theory)

In summary, after considering isomorphism and permutations, it can be concluded that there is only one 2-regular graph on 5 vertices, which is topologically equivalent to a pentagon. This is due to the fact that any other permutation or arrangement of the vertices will result in isomorphic graphs, proving that there is only one unique 2-regular graph on 5 vertices.
  • #1
TheMathNoob
189
4

Homework Statement


1. up to isomorphism, there is only one 2-regular graph on 5 vertices.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am still working on the problem, but I don't understand what up to isomorphism means. Does it mean without considering isomorphism?. I just need help with that. Considering isomorphism, the first thing that comes to mind is a pentagon. The complement of this graph would also be a 2-regular on 5 vertices. Therefore, the original statement would be false.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The proposition means 'All 2-regular graphs on five vertices are isomorphic to one another'.
TheMathNoob said:
The complement of this graph would also be a 2-regular on 5 vertices.
Correct
TheMathNoob said:
Therefore, the original statement would be false.
No, because the complement is isomorphic to the original.
 
  • #3
andrewkirk said:
The proposition means 'All 2-regular graphs on five vertices are isomorphic to one another'.

Correct

No, because the complement is isomorphic to the original.
so if two graphs are isomorphic, it doesn't mean that they are different?
 
  • #4
Different graphs can be isomorphic. Here are two different but isomorphic graphs on three points:

{ {1,2} }
{ {2,3} }

The isomorphism is the function { (1,2), (2,3), (3,1) }
 
  • #5
andrewkirk said:
Different graphs can be isomorphic. Here are two different but isomorphic graphs on three points:

{ {1,2} }
{ {2,3} }

The isomorphism is the function { (1,2), (2,3), (3,1) }
The way to get all 2-regular graphs on 5 vertices would be by making permutations among vertices and calculating the complement of the original graph. All this leads to being isomorphic to one another. Is there any other way to get other isomorphic graphs?. Am I taking the right approach to solve this problem?. I also want to add that the only way to make a 2-regular graph on 5 vertices is a pentagon and the complement of the pentagon. I think. Is there another way?
 
  • #6
@TheMathNoob You don't have to take complements. Permutations will cover all possible cases. That is, the set of isomorphs of a graph G is simply the set of graphs obtained by permuting the vertices and edges of G.
By the way, the complement of a pentagon is topologically a pentagon. You just need to move the vertices around a bit after taking the complement and you'll end up with a pentagon with permuted vertex labels.

You are correct that all 2-regular graphs on five vertices are (topologically equivalent to) pentagons. Have you made any progress on working out how to prove that?
 
  • #7
andrewkirk said:
@TheMathNoob You don't have to take complements. Permutations will cover all possible cases. That is, the set of isomorphs of a graph G is simply the set of graphs obtained by permuting the vertices and edges of G.
By the way, the complement of a pentagon is topologically a pentagon. You just need to move the vertices around a bit after taking the complement and you'll end up with a pentagon with permuted vertex labels.

You are correct that all 2-regular graphs on five vertices are (topologically equivalent to) pentagons. Have you made any progress on working out how to prove that?
Hi andrw, thank you for the help. I am still working on the problem. I need to know what you mean with topologically equivalent to.
 
  • #8
TheMathNoob said:
I need to know what you mean with topologically equivalent to
The layperson's description is that two shapes are topologically equivalent if one can be transformed into the other by continuous deformation. There is no cutting or gluing allowed, but you can rotate, translate and bend as much as you like.
 
  • #9
andrewkirk said:
The layperson's description is that two shapes are topologically equivalent if one can be transformed into the other by continuous deformation. There is no cutting or gluing allowed, but you can rotate, translate and bend as much as you like.
This is so far what I got

Proof

Let Z be a set of 5 vertices v1,v2,v3,v4,v5. A 2-regular graph on 5 vertices is a graph in which the degree of every vertex is 2.
If we start linking every vertex with every other vertex in the set in a way that the degree of the vertices can be 2, we will realize that the graph is always equivalent to a pentagon.

Pick V1
In this case we can just link V1 to any vertex hence there is currently just one vertex in the graph. Let’s do V1V2.

Pick V2
In this case we can just link V2 to remaining vertices because V2 is already linked to V1. Let’s do V2V3.

Pick V3
In this case we can’t link V3 to V1 because the remaining vertices would have to have a degree of just 1. And we can’t like V3 to V2 because they are already linked, so the best option for V3 is any remaining vertex. Let’s do V3V4

Pick V4
In this we can’t link V4 to V1 and V2 because the remaining vertex would have to have a degree of 0 and V3 because they are already linked. The best option for V4 would be V5. Let’s do V4V5.

Pick V5
This is the last vertex and the only way to make this graph 2 regular would be by linking V5 to V1.

We can just do the same process in any order you want and the outcome will always be a pentagon. Permuting vertices in a pentagon just creates isomorphic relations among themselves therefore there is just one 2-regular graph on 5 vertices.
 
Last edited:

1. What is an isomorphism in graph theory?

An isomorphism in graph theory is a function that maps one graph onto another while preserving the structure and relationships between vertices and edges. In simpler terms, it is a way of representing the same graph in a different way.

2. How do you prove two graphs are isomorphic?

To prove that two graphs are isomorphic, you must show that there exists a bijective function (one-to-one and onto) between the vertices of the two graphs that preserves adjacency. This means that for every edge in one graph, there must be a corresponding edge in the other graph, and for every non-edge in one graph, there must be a non-edge in the other graph.

3. Are all isomorphic graphs identical?

No, isomorphic graphs are not identical. They may have the same number of vertices and edges, and the same degree sequence, but they can still have different vertex and edge labels and different structural properties.

4. What is the importance of isomorphism in graph theory?

Isomorphism is important in graph theory because it allows us to simplify and analyze complex graphs by representing them in a more understandable and structured way. It also helps in identifying similarities and differences between different graphs, which can lead to a better understanding of their properties and relationships.

5. Can a graph be isomorphic to itself?

Yes, a graph can be isomorphic to itself. This means that it can be mapped onto itself in a way that preserves its structure and relationships between vertices and edges. However, this is not always the case, and it depends on the specific graph and its properties.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
680
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
872
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
975
Back
Top