Proof about the decomposition of the reals into two sets.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the existence of a unique real number β that separates two nonempty sets S and T of real numbers, where every real number is in either S or T, and if s is in S and t is in T, then s < t. The proof hinges on the concepts of supremum and infimum, asserting that S has a supremum (β) and T has an infimum (β). The participant expresses uncertainty about proof-writing and seeks clarification on theorems related to least upper bounds and greatest lower bounds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real number sets and their properties
  • Familiarity with supremum and infimum concepts
  • Basic knowledge of proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Introduction to calculus and set theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of supremum and infimum in real analysis
  • Learn about proof techniques, especially proof by contradiction and direct proof
  • Explore the completeness property of real numbers
  • Review theorems related to least upper bounds and greatest lower bounds
USEFUL FOR

Students in introductory calculus courses, particularly those learning about real analysis and proof-writing techniques. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to understand the foundational concepts of set theory and bounds in mathematics.

thenthanable
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let S and T be nonempty sets of real numbers such that every real number is in S or T and if s [itex]\in[/itex] S and t [itex]\in[/itex] T, then s < t. Prove that there is a unique real number β such that every real number less than β is in S and every real number greater than β is in T.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried a proof by contradiction, but I started with the assumption that the preposition was true (not sure if that is OK). I haven't had a formal introduction into proof-writing. I'm 3 weeks into my calculus course and that was one of the exercises given in the TB.

The preposition states that S has a sup β, and T has an inf β, where β is a unique real number.

Suppose that β does not exist. Thus S does not have a supremum, and is not bounded above. T does not have an infimum, and is not bounded below. Thus both S and T are the set of real numbers.

Therefore, there exists an so and a to such that So > To.

I would really appreciate comments because like I said I'm completely new to this stuff. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have theorems about "greatest lower bound" or "least upper bounds" of sets of numbers? Such as "if a set of real numbers has an upper bound then it has a least upper bound (supremum)" or "if a set of real numbers has a lower bound then it has a greatest lower bound (infimum)". Those are what you need.
 
We know that T is bounded below and S is bounded above - how?

Then we can get onto comparing least/greatest bounds as applicable...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K