Understanding Existence and Uniqueness

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the existence and uniqueness of the multiplicative inverse for any non-zero complex number α in ℂ. The proof demonstrates that for every α ≠ 0, there exists a unique β such that αβ = 1, using the properties of complex numbers and field axioms. The proof of existence is established through algebraic manipulation, while uniqueness is shown via the cancellation law. The participants emphasize the importance of clearly stating the well-defined nature of the inverse and the assumptions made regarding field properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers (ℂ) and their properties
  • Familiarity with field axioms and their implications
  • Basic algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, particularly regarding inverses
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of fields in detail, particularly the field axioms for ℝ and ℂ
  • Learn about the cancellation law in algebra and its applications in proofs
  • Explore the concept of multiplicative inverses in various mathematical structures
  • Review Axler's "Linear Algebra Done Right" for further insights on linear algebra proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra and complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in understanding proofs related to field properties and inverses.

Bishamonten
Messages
17
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that for every α ∈ ℂ with α ≠ 0, there exists a unique β ∈ ℂ such that αβ = 1

Homework Equations



Definition[/B]: ## \mathbb {F^n} ##

## \mathbb {F^n} ## is the set of all lists of length n of elements of ## \mathbb {F} ## :
## \mathbb {F} ## = {## (x_1,...,x_n) : x_j ∈ \mathbb {F} for j = 1,...,n ##}

Definition: addition in ## \mathbb {F^n} ##
## (x_1,...,x_n) + (y_1,...,y_n) = (x_1 + y_1,..., x_n + y_n) ##

Definition: scalar multiplication in ## \mathbb {F^n} ##
##λ(x_1,...,x_n) = (λx_1,...,λx_n) ##
##λ ∈ \mathbb {F}, (x_1,...,x_n) ∈ \mathbb {F^n}##

And the 7 other properties of fields: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_(mathematics)#Classic_definition

The Attempt at a Solution


## α ∈ ℂ → α = a + ui## ##a, u ∈ ℝ ##
##β ∈ ℂ → β = b + vi## ##b, v ∈ ℝ ##
##∃γ∈ℂ## such that ##γ = \frac{1}{α} = \frac {1}{a+ui} = c + di## ## c,d ∈ ℝ ##

Proof:

Existence

By multiplicative identity
: $$ \frac {1}{a+ui}\frac {(a-ui)}{(a-ui)} = \frac {(a-ui)}{(a^2 + u^2)} = \frac {(a)}{(a^2 + u^2)} +\frac {(-u)}{(a^2 + u^2)}i $$

By definition of real numbers:
$$ = s + ti$$ $$s, t ∈ ℝ $$
By definition of complex numbers:
$$ = ψ ∈ ℂ $$

Let ## b = \frac {a}{a^2 + u^2}, v = \frac {-u}{a^2 + u^2}##, then

By substitution: $$ β = b + vi = \frac {a}{a^2 + u^2} + \frac {(-u)}{a^2 + u^2}i = \frac {1}{a+ui}$$

$$ → αβ = (a+ui)\frac {1}{(a+ui)} = 1$$

Uniqueness

Suppose ∃δ∈ℂ such that αδ = 1

$$ αβ = 1 $$ and $$ αδ = 1 $$

By transitivity of equality:

$$αβ = αδ $$
By cancellation:
$$ β = δ $$My question is, have I correctly proved the uniqueness part? Was I also doing a bit too much with the existence portion of the proof? This very simple exercise comes from Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right. I always felt a bit iffy proving uniqueness in linear algebra, and wish to brush up the subject again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure this is correct. If you assume the field axioms for ##\mathbb{C}##, then you have a unique inverse for any non-zero element, which is what you are trying to prove.

I suggest you can assume the field axioms for ##\mathbb{R}## and what you have proved already for ##\mathbb{C}## - commutivity, associativity, distributive law etc. But, I don't know exactly how your book approaches this.

For the uniqueness part, I'm not sure you can invoke a "cancellation" law. But, once you have proved existence, you might think about how you show uniqueness. Hint: similar to cancellation but using what you have shown already in this proof.

Finally, you took a lot of algebra to show that ##\frac{a - bi}{a^2 + b^2} (a+bi) = 1##. You could simply have shown that directly and thereby proved existence. Note that you need to say something about why ##\frac{a - bi}{a^2 + b^2}## is well-defined. Hint: why does this not apply to ##0##?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K