1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proof divergence of vector potential = 0

  1. Oct 1, 2015 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I need to show that $$\del*\vec{A(\vec{r})}=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int{\frac{\vec{J{vec\r'}}}{\vec{R}}}d\tau=0$$
    where A is the vector potential and R refers to "script r" or (r-r') where r is source point of charge and r' is the measurement point. tau refers to a volume integral. I have tried many times now to show this by bringing del into the integrand using product rules and the fact that $$\delR=-\del'R'$$ but cannot make it equal zero. Im not sure if there is something I have overlooked or another method to use but any help or suggestions are much appreciated!!
    2. Relevant equations
    del*R=-del'R' must be used at some point



    3. The attempt at a solution
    My solution thus far goes like this (Sorry My latex is awful so I will just write out my method)
    1) bring Del into the integrand
    2) using product rule rule of dot products expand into 2 terms each with its own dot product
    3) del*J' =0 since del operates on unprimed coordinates
    4) J' del*1/R does not equal zero therefore integrand does not equal zero :/
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 1, 2015 #2
    I should add that its divergence of A, meaning del dot A =0 . Also, I am aware of the other thread regarding this problem however that thread does not contain any useful information or attempt a solution.
     
  4. Oct 1, 2015 #3

    fzero

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    From what you've said, you should be able to show that
    $$ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{x}) = - \frac{\mu}{4\pi} \int \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}') \cdot \nabla' \left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{x}- \mathbf{x}'|} \right) d\mathbf{x}'.$$
    The next step would be to integrate by parts and argue that both terms vanish independently subject to reasonable assumptions.
     
  5. Oct 6, 2015 #4

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member


    You write "... r is source point of charge ..." but don't you mean "source point of current density"? The integral certainly looks like the magnetic vector potential, especially with the μ in it ... based on that assumption I offer the following:

    ∇⋅A
    = 0 is not an identity. It is chosen as a convenience.
    We define A as H = ∇ x A.
    By Maxwell, ∇ x H = j (j = current density).
    So j = ∇ x (∇ x A).
    But by a mathematical identity, this can be rewritten as
    j = ∇(∇⋅A) - ∇2A
    So we choose ∇⋅A = 0, giving
    2A = -j
    i.e. the Poisson equation, the solution for which is your integral. BTW the denominator in the integrand should read |R|. You can't divide one vector by another, at least not to my knowledge.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Proof divergence of vector potential = 0
  1. Vector potential (Replies: 9)

  2. Vector potential (Replies: 1)

Loading...