Proof: if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter samsun2024
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 11K views
samsun2024
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
let x,y,ε in ℝ.
if x≤y+ε for every ε>0 then x≤y

hints: use proof by contrapositive .

i try to proof it, and end up showing that...
if x+ε≤y for every ε>0 then x≤y
 
on Phys.org
Suppose, [itex]x > y[/itex]. Then, take [itex]\epsilon = 2 (x - y)[/itex]. Is the first inequality satisfied?
 
Dickfore said:
Suppose, [itex]x > y[/itex]. Then, take [itex]\epsilon = 2 (x - y)[/itex]. Is the first inequality satisfied?

The contrapositive is [itex]x>y \Rightarrow x>y+ε[/itex]
[itex]\epsilon = 2 (x - y)[/itex] would not work:
[itex]x>y+ε \Rightarrow x>y+2 (x - y) \Rightarrow -x>-y[/itex], a contradiction unless [itex]x=y[/itex].
[itex]\epsilon = (x - y)/2[/itex] would work though.
 
oleador said:
The contrapositive is [itex]x>y \Rightarrow x>y+ε[/itex]


*** No, it is not. The contrapositive is [itex]x>y\Longrightarrow x\nleq y+\epsilon[/itex] , for some [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex]

DonAntonio


[itex]\epsilon = 2 (x - y)[/itex] would not work:
[itex]x>y+ε \Rightarrow x>y+2 (x - y) \Rightarrow -x>-y[/itex], a contradiction unless [itex]x=y[/itex].
[itex]\epsilon = (x - y)/2[/itex] would work though.

...
 
True. Confused [itex]\forallε>0[x≤y+ε]\Rightarrow x≤y[/itex] with [itex]\forallε>0[x≤y+ε\Rightarrow x≤y][/itex].
The former is true.

This, however, does not change my conclusion. [itex]ε=2(x−y)[/itex] doesn't work, while [itex]ε=(x−y)/2[/itex] does.