Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proof of a limit of a cubic like sequence.

  1. Aug 12, 2008 #1
    Now this is an example in my book that I don't really understand. It says prove that the limit of (4n^(3)+3n)/(n^(3)-6))=4 as n goes to infinity.

    Basically the definition of a limit of a sequence as n->infinity is as follows.

    For any epsilion>0 there is a N>0 such that n>N=> |{a}-L|<epsilion

    So here's the book's solution. I just don't know why they found upper bounds.

    |(4n^(3)+3n)/(n^(3)-6) - 4|=|(3n+4)/(n^(3)-6)|<epslion

    but if n>or=2, (3n+4)/(n^(3)-6)<epslion.

    (3n+24)<or =30n

    & (n^(3)-6)>or =(1/2)n^(3)

    So, (3n+4)/(n^(3)-6)<or= (30n)/( (1/2)n^(3))<epsion

    => 60/n^(2)<epslion
    => (60/epslion)^(-1/2)<n

    so this implies that we make N=max{2, (60/epslion)^(-1/2)}

    Now here's my much more simplistic solution.

    I never found a reason why they used an upper bound. Wouldn't a lower bound work just as well?

    (3n+4)/(n^(3)-6)<epslion. { still given that n>or=2}

    n/(n^(2)) <(3n+4)/(n^(3)-6)<epslion. Now I chose the denominator,n^2, arbitaritly just to make just sure that the denominator becomes smaller.

    So solving, 1/epslion<n. This implies that we make N=max{2, 1/epsilion}.

    See how simple this is. I didn't even use equal to or greater than/ less than. I just used a straightforward inequality. But is it correct? I have no clue why the book did it with upper bounds.
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 12, 2008 #2
    (4 * oo^3 + 3*oo)/(oo^3-6)) = 4
    (4 * oo^3)/(oo^3)
    4 = 4

    I don't see what would be wrong with just showing that kn^3/n^3 for all n is k, and that n^3 + n = n^3 as n approaches infinity.

    I could be wrong though.
  4. Aug 13, 2008 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I'm not sure you can justify cancelling infinities like that. More rigorous is to divide by both numerator and denominator by the highest power of n:
    [tex]\frac{4n^3+ 3n}{n^3- 6}= \frac{4+ \frac{3}{n^2}}{1- \frac{6}{n^3}}[/tex]
    Since both 3/n2 and 6/n3[/sub] go to 0 as n goes to infinity, the limit is 4/1= 4.
  5. Aug 13, 2008 #4
    But I'm trying to understand it from a formal approach using epslion and a bound as they do in real analysis.
  6. Aug 13, 2008 #5
    For proving this limit I would use the same method as Hall, I would devide each term in the numerator and denominator by the highest power of x that occurs in the denominator, namely, n3. Just like he did.

    You must remember that [tex]lim_{x \rightarrow\pm \infty} \frac{1}{x} = 0[/tex] etc, and voila, you have limit = 4

    Why can't you try L'Hopital's rule, btw?
  7. Aug 13, 2008 #6
    I'm not allowed to do that because I'm self studying real analysis. I need to prove things from the most fundamental steps. I have to use the definition of a limit. Which is, for a sequence,

    Lim{a}=L as n-> infinity means,

    For any epsilion>0 there is a N>0 such that n>N=> |{a}-L|<epsilion
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Proof of a limit of a cubic like sequence.
  1. Limit of a sequence (Replies: 28)

  2. Limit of sequence (Replies: 1)

  3. Limits of a sequence (Replies: 1)