Proof of a partial fraction theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the proof of a theorem related to the Heaviside method, which is associated with partial fractions and integration. The original poster seeks a formal proof for academic purposes, expressing difficulty in finding resources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants inquire about the specific theorem the original poster is referring to and question the nature of proving an algorithm versus a theorem. There is a suggestion that the original poster might need to derive the proof independently.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring the need for a proof and the implications of proving an algorithm. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the proof, but no consensus has been reached on the specifics of the theorem in question.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions needing the proof for class, indicating a potential constraint related to academic requirements. There is also a suggestion that the original poster's textbook provides a method but lacks a formal proof.

Kinsama
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've been looking all over the net since yesterday for a PROOF of a theorem called the "heaviside method" it involves partial fractions and itegration of such. If anyone could show me a proof of it or send me a link of it I would gladly appreciate it, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of what, specifically, do you want a proof?

P.S. if you have an algorithm that does something, that is a proof that you can do that something.
 
i want a proof of a theorem called the Heaviside Method, my book tells how to do it, but i need a proof of it for class and its almost impossible to find.
 
Well, if you need it for class, shouldn't you prove it yourself? :-p And I don't even know the theorem you're trying to prove -- I can find references to the algorithm called "Heaviside's method", but you can't prove an algorithm. (The very idea is nonsensical)

My best guess is that you want a proof that the algorithm works as advertised, and I've already given you a hint: just prove that the output of the algorithm is what it claims to be
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K