Proof of Group Property: G is a Group

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohnDuck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a set G with a binary operation * satisfies the group properties based on certain axioms, including closure, associativity, the existence of an identity element, and the existence of inverses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of having a left inverse and question the uniqueness of the identity element. There are attempts to manipulate expressions involving the operation to derive properties of the identity and inverses.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts and attempts to simplify the proof. Some guidance has been offered regarding the uniqueness of the identity element and the relationship between left and right inverses, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of proving certain properties without falling into circular reasoning, particularly regarding the existence of right inverses and the uniqueness of the identity element.

JohnDuck
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let G be a set with an operation * such that:
1. G is closed under *.
2. * is associative.
3. There exists an element e in G such that e*x = x.
4. Given x in G, there exists a y in G such that y*x = e.

Prove that G is a group.


Homework Equations


I need to prove that x*e = x and x*y = e, with x, y, e as given above.

The Attempt at a Solution


I dunno, I'm stumped. I've tried finding some sort of clever identity without any success.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm just playing around here to reduce the number of things we have to prove. We know x has a left inverse y. What is xyx? It is x(yx)=x, and it is (xy)x, thus if we could show that the e in 3 was unique, we'd have xy=e, and x would have a right inverse.

So we just have to show that fx=x implies f=e, to obtain the existence of right inverses.

Now, supposing that we have inverses on both sides, what can we say? Well, x*e=x(x^-1x)=(xx^-1)x=e*x, so we get a unique two sided identity.

Putting that together, all I need to show is that fx=x implies f=e. Is that any easier? (it is implied by the existence of right inverses, but that is circular logic, so careful how you try to prove it).
 
Last edited:
I'm still not making any progress. :(
 
Here's a start on one of them:
Let's say we have some [itex]i[/itex] (not necessarily [itex]e[/itex]) with
[tex]i \times x = x[/tex]
then
[tex]i \times i = i[/tex]
[tex]i^{-1} \times (i \times i) =i^{-1} \times i[/tex]
.
.
.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K