Proof of Limit of a Recursive Sequence

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tclack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Proof Sequence
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
Tclack
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
So I came across the statement:

Since [itex]x_n -> \inf[/itex]
then [itex]x_n_+_1 -> \inf[/itex]

This is very basic, But I'm already into recursive formulas for infinite series, so I should know why this is true. Does anyone have a small proof. An informal one will do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought of something.
As X_n goes to infinity, it passes X_(n+1)
 
I'm not sure what that means! For any n, n< n+1. But I think you mean that, for fixed N, eventually, n> N+1.

A little more precisely, if [itex]\{a_n\}[/itex] converges to A, then, for any [itex]\epsilon> 0[/itex], there exist N such that if n> N, [itex]|a_n- A|< \epsilon[/itex].

Now, if [itex]b_n= a_{n+1}[/itex], for any [itex]\epsilon> 0[/itex], take N'= N-1 where N is the number, above, for that same [itex]\epsilon[/itex].

Then if n> N' , n+1> N'+1= N so [itex]|b_n- A|= |a_{n+1}- A|< \epsilon[/itex], showing that [itex]\{b_n\}[/itex] also converges to A.

(Roughly speaking, [itex]\{a_n\}[/itex] and [itex]\{a_{n+1}\}[/itex] are really the same sequence, just with the "numbering" altered slighly. Of course, they have the same limit.)
 
You need to know what subsequences are:
You choose a strictly monotonically increasing sequences of natural numbers:

[tex] n_{k}, n_{k} \in \mathbb{N}, n_{k + 1} > n_{k}, \; k = 0, 1, \ldots[/tex]

Then, a subsequence of the sequence [itex]\{x_{n}\}[/itex] is defined as:
[tex] \tilde{x}_{k} \equiv x_{n_{k}}[/tex]

The (informal) theorem you will need to remember is:

Any subsequence has the same convergence properties and the same limit if convergent as its sequence.


How would you choose your subsequence?