Proof of product rule for gradients

  • #1
Alvise_Souta
4
1
product rule.png

Can someone please help me prove this product rule? I'm not accustomed to seeing the del operator used on a dot product. My understanding tells me that a dot product produces a scalar and I'm tempted to evaluate the left hand side as scalar 0 but the rule says it yields a vector. I'm very confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Alvise_Souta said:
My understanding tells me that a dot product produces a scalar and I'm tempted to evaluate the left hand side as scalar 0 but the rule says it yields a vector.
Del operator ##\nabla## is a vector operator, following the rule for well-defined operations involving a vector and a scalar, a del operator can be multiplied by a scalar using the usual product. ##\mathbf{A}\cdot \mathbf{B}## is a scalar, but a vector (operator) ##\nabla## comes in from the left, therefore the "product" ##\nabla (\mathbf{A}\cdot \mathbf{B})## will yield a vector.
 
  • #3
So it becomes a vector because it doesn't evaluate to 0 since the del operator is used on a scalar function rather than a scalar constant?
 
  • #4
Alvise_Souta said:
So it becomes a vector because it doesn't evaluate to 0 since the del operator is used on a scalar function rather than a scalar constant?
Well that's a matter of whether ##\mathbf{A}\cdot \mathbf{B}## is coordinate dependent or not. If this dot product turns out to be constant, then ##\nabla(\mathbf{A}\cdot \mathbf{B})=0##.
 
  • #5
A and B are meant to be interpreted as vector fields (physics texts frequently conflate vector fields with vectors, using the word "vector" to refer to both vectors and vector fields, where the exact meaning is meant to be gleaned from context): functions that assign a unique vector to each point. The dot product of two vector fields is therefore a scalar field, as it is meant to be interpreted as the function that assigns the dot product of the two vectors assigned by A and B, respectively, at each point to each point. The gradient of a scalar field is a vector field (or covector field, depending on how formal you want to get).
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top