Proof of S^n=0 When S is Lower Triangular Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nusc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that if S is a lower triangular matrix of size n x n, then S^n equals the zero matrix. Participants clarify that the original matrix presented is not a general lower triangular matrix but rather a specific case with ones on the subdiagonal. A counterexample is provided, demonstrating that for certain lower triangular matrices, such as S = [[1, 0, 0], [1, 1, 0], [1, 1, 1]], S^3 does not equal the zero matrix. The conclusion emphasizes the need for precise definitions in mathematical statements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lower triangular matrices
  • Familiarity with matrix multiplication
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of strictly lower triangular matrices
  • Learn about mathematical induction in the context of matrix theory
  • Explore counterexamples in linear algebra
  • Investigate the implications of matrix powers in linear transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians interested in matrix theory, and educators teaching concepts related to triangular matrices and their properties.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



If S is a lower triangular matrix (n by n), S^n is the zero matrix.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



S =

0 0 0 0 ... 0
1 0 0 0 ... 0
0 1 0 0 ... 0
0 0 1 0 ... 0
...
0 0 0 0 .1.0


S^2 =


0 0 0 0 ... 0
0 0 0 0 ... 0
1 0 0 0 ... 0
0 1 0 0 ... 0
...
0 0 0 0 1.. 0


How do I show this using induction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure it's true?
 
No. So given S as I defined above then computing S^2, and S^3 so forth, the entries lower each row for each n. how do I generalize this?
 
Use the definition of matrix multiplication to show that the value of Sk-1k,1 = 1 but Sk-1< k,* = 0 and Sk-1k, >1and<n = 0 => Sk*,* = 0.

Where * means any row and any column.

edit: If you are trying to prove that statement in general, you might want to consider the identity matrix which is both n x n and lower triangular.
 
First, a lower triangular matrix is one where the entries above the diagonal are zero. The matrix you show has ones down the lower subdiagonal and zeroes everywhere else.
Second, the statement isn't true.

Here's a counterexample for n = 3.

S =
[1 0 0]
[1 1 0]
[1 1 1]

S^2=
[1 0 0]
[2 1 0]
[3 2 1]

S^3=
[1 0 0]
[3 1 0]
[6 3 1]

The upshot is that S is a lower triangular 3 x 3 matrix, but S^3 != 0.
 
Are you sure the question isn't in regards to a 'strictly lower triangular matrix'?
 
The matrix is this:

S =

0 0 0 0 ... 0
1 0 0 0 ... 0
0 1 0 0 ... 0
0 0 1 0 ... 0
...
0 0 0 0 .1.0

it's not a lower triangular matrix.
 
It would be helpful if we knew exactly how the problem is stated. In your first post, here is what you had:

Homework Statement



If S is a lower triangular matrix (n by n), S^n is the zero matrix.

The somewhat sparse n x n matrix with 1s on the subdiagonal appeared in your attempt at a solution.

Is the problem statement to show that for that matrix S, S^n = 0?

Inquiring minds would like to know...
 
Okay.
Given
=

0 0 0 0 ... 0
1 0 0 0 ... 0
0 1 0 0 ... 0
0 0 1 0 ... 0
...
0 0 0 0 .1.0

Compute (S^n)(S^n*) and (S^*n)(S^n)

where * is the complex conjugate transpose.
 
  • #10
Nusc said:
The matrix is this:

S =

0 0 0 0 ... 0
1 0 0 0 ... 0
0 1 0 0 ... 0
0 0 1 0 ... 0
...
0 0 0 0 .1.0

it's not a lower triangular matrix.
Actually, that is a "lower triangular matrix" (it has only 0s above the main diagonal), just not a general lower triangular matrix as was intially implied.
 
  • #11
So in Compute (S^n)(S^n*) and (S^*n)(S^n)
they're both zero correct?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K