Proof that closure of a space equals another space.

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
Paalfaal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Define:

- c0 = {(xn)n [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]\ell[/itex][itex]\infty[/itex] : limn → [itex]\infty[/itex] xn = 0}

- l0 = {(xn)n [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]\ell[/itex][itex]\infty[/itex] : [itex]\exists[/itex] N [itex]\in[/itex] the natural numbers, (xn)n = 0, n [itex]\geq[/itex] N}Problem: Prove that [itex]\overline{\ell}[/itex]0= c0 in [itex]\ell[/itex][itex]\infty[/itex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I want to find the solution using the limit-definition of closure.

Considering an element

x = (xn) [itex]\in[/itex] c0

and a sequence

yj = (xjn) [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]\ell[/itex]0,

such that xnj = xn for n < j, xnj = 0, otherwise.

Using the metric induced by the supremum norm; || xn - xnj || [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] 0 as j tends to infinity. We can du this for all elements in c0, and hence c0 [itex]\subseteq[/itex] [itex]\overline{\ell}[/itex]0.

My problem is to show the other direction, that is

[itex]\overline{\ell}[/itex]0 [itex]\subseteq[/itex] c0

I need to show that elements in [itex]\overline{\ell}[/itex]0 has a vanishing limit. I don't know how to do this using the supremum norm. In fact, it seems impossible to me..

Can I get any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm.. When is it true that [itex]A \subseteq B \Rightarrow[/itex] [itex]\bar{A}[/itex] [itex]\subseteq[/itex] [itex]\bar{B}[/itex] ?


I ask because I've been working on a similar problem: Prove that [itex]\bar{\ell}[/itex]0 = [itex]\ell[/itex]2 in [itex]\ell[/itex]2.

With a similar approach of the attempt above I got [itex]\bar{\ell}[/itex]0 [itex]\supseteq[/itex] [itex]\ell[/itex]2.

Since [itex]\ell[/itex]0 [itex]\subseteq[/itex] [itex]\ell[/itex]2 (for obvious reasons),
[itex]\bar{\ell}[/itex]0 [itex]\subseteq[/itex][itex]\ell[/itex]2 iff [itex]\ell[/itex]2 = [itex]\bar{\ell}[/itex]2 (correct me if I'm wrong here).

In that case, [itex]\bar{\ell}[/itex]0 = [itex]\ell[/itex]2 in [itex]\ell[/itex]2.


(I guess it might is trivial that [itex]\ell[/itex]2 = [itex]\bar{\ell}[/itex]2 in [itex]\ell[/itex]2, but Is there an easy way to prove this?)

Any comments?

:smile:
 
Paalfaal said:
Hmmm.. When is it true that [itex]A \subseteq B \Rightarrow[/itex] [itex]\bar{A}[/itex] [itex]\subseteq[/itex] [itex]\bar{B}[/itex] ?

This is always true. Try to prove it.

(I guess it might is trivial that [itex]\ell[/itex]2 = [itex]\bar{\ell}[/itex]2 in [itex]\ell[/itex]2, but Is there an easy way to prove this?)

If X is a metric space, then [itex]\overline{X}=X[/itex] (closure in X). Try to prove this.
 
micromass said:
Try to prove it.

I certiantly will!


Thank you for your help! Much appreciated :smile: