Proof that the general solution of a linear equation is....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of the theorem regarding linear transformations, specifically that if T: V → W is a linear transformation and T(u0) = w, then every solution u can be expressed as u = u0 + v, where v is in the kernel of T. The proof is divided into two parts: first, demonstrating that the form u = u0 + v satisfies T(u) = w, and second, showing that any solution can be represented in this form. The confusion arises in the second part, where the substitution of variables is clarified to avoid circular reasoning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations and their properties
  • Familiarity with kernel and image of a linear map
  • Knowledge of vector spaces and their operations
  • Basic grasp of isomorphism theorems in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in depth
  • Learn about the kernel and image of linear maps
  • Explore the isomorphism theorems in linear algebra
  • Practice solving linear equations and understanding their general solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of linear transformations and their applications in vector spaces.

Woolyabyss
Messages
142
Reaction score
1
any particular solution plus the general solution to the homogeneous equation.

I'm having difficuilty understanding this proof from my lecture notes

Theorem
: Let T : V → W be a linear transformation. Let w ∈ W and suppose T(u0) = w

T(v) = 0. where v ∈ V (the kernel )

to prove:
T(u) = w, where u = u0 + v

proof: (from my lecture notes)

First, we show that every vector of the form u = u0 + v
where T(u0) = w and T(v) = 0, satisfies T(u) = w:
T(u) = T(u0 + v) = T(u0) + T(v) = w + 0 = w

Now we show that every solution looks like this.
Suppose that T(u) = w. Let v = u − u0.
Then u0 + v = u0 + (u − u0) = u and v is in the kernel of
T: T(v) = T(u − u0) = T(u) − T(u0) = w − w = 0

I can follow the first part of the proof. The second part is where I'm having difficulty. I'm not sure how the last three lines show that every solution looks like u = u0 + w, particularly the second last line. Is that not showing what we were already given?
Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Replace
"Suppose that T(u) = w. Let v = u - u0"
by
"Suppose that T(y) = w. Let v = y - u0 "
and now it no longer shows what we were already given !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Woolyabyss
This is the way that makes sense to me:

Assume T(a)=w =T(b). Then T(a)-T(b)=T(a-b)=0 , so a-b ## \in K ## ; K :=Kernel T.

Then a-b=k, so a =b+K. Then T(b)=w iff b=a-K . EDIT: BTW this is related to one of the
isomorphism theorems stating that if T: V-->W is a homeomorphism (a linear map, in our case)

with kernel K , then T: V/K --> T(W) is an isomorphism. Moding out by the kernel just collapses
elements with the same preimage, so you get a linear bijection between V/K and the image.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K