MHB Proof that the product of 4 consecutive numbers is not a perfect square.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The product of four consecutive positive integers, represented as x, x+1, x+2, and x+3, is proven not to be a perfect square. The proof utilizes the formulation x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) = k² for some integer k, leading to the equation (x² + 3x + 1)² - k² = 1, which results in a contradiction when k = 0. This confirms that the product cannot yield a perfect square, as one of the integers must be zero, which violates the condition of positivity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic manipulation
  • Familiarity with the concept of perfect squares
  • Knowledge of the difference of squares theorem
  • Ability to evaluate polynomial functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of perfect squares in number theory
  • Learn about the difference of squares and its applications
  • Investigate polynomial functions and their behavior with integer inputs
  • Study mathematical induction as a method for proving statements about integers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students interested in number theory, particularly those exploring properties of integers and perfect squares.

speencer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I was thinking and I realized that this is true and I want to prove it but I have nowhere to start. If anyone knows any way to prove can you give me some advice on where to start.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
speencer said:
Hey,

I was thinking and I realized that this is true and I want to prove it but I have nowhere to start. If anyone knows any way to prove can you give me some advice on where to start.
Hint: Any four consecutive integers include one multiple of 4 and an odd multiple of 2.
 
Opalg said:
Hint: Any four consecutive integers include one multiple of 4 and an odd multiple of 2.
And obviously "an odd multiple of 2" here means the product of 2 and an odd number, not a multiple of 2 that is odd.
 
speencer said:
Hey,

I was thinking and I realized that this is true and I want to prove it but I have nowhere to start. If anyone knows any way to prove can you give me some advice on where to start.

The correct formulation should be...

Prove that the product of four consecutive numbers all different from 0 is not a perfect square...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Hello, speencer!

Prove that the product of four consecutive positive integers is not a perfect square.
The four consecutive positive integers are: .x,\,x+1,\,x+2,\,x+3

Suppose their product is a perfect square.
. . x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3) \:=\:k^2\;\text{ for some integer }k.

We have: .. . . x(x+3)\cdot(x+1)(x+2) \:=\:k^2

. . . . . . . . . . . . (x^2+3x)(x^2+3x+2) \:=\: k^2

. \big[(x^2+3x+1)-1\big]\big[(x^2+3x+1) + 1\big] \:=\:k^2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (x^2+3x+1)^2 - 1^2 \:=\:k^2

And we have: .(x^2+3x+1)^2 - k^2 \:=\:1
. . The difference of two squares is 1.

The only case is when: x^2+3x+1 \:=\:1\,\text{ and }\,k\:=\:0

If k = 0, then one of the four integers must be zero.
We have our contradiction.

Therefore, the product of four consecutive positive integers cannot be a square.
 
speencer said:
Hey,

I was thinking and I realized that this is true and I want to prove it but I have nowhere to start. If anyone knows any way to prove can you give me some advice on where to start.
To know how to start its a good idea to "get your hands dirty". Start putting values of $n$ in $f(n)=n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)$.

You get:
$f(1)=24, f(2)=120, f(3)=360, f(4)=840$.
Each of these is equal to a one less a square.
So one can guess that $f(n)$ always is equal to $k^2-1$ for some $k$.
Then one can go ahead in the direction of proving it which many have done in the previous posts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K