Proofing Capacitance: Understanding Electrostatics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Humanist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on understanding capacitance in electrostatics, specifically through the analysis of a parallel-plate capacitor (PPC). Capacitance (C) is defined as the ratio of charge (Q) to electric potential (V), expressed as C = (ε₀ × A) / d, where ε₀ is the permittivity of free space, A is the area of the plates, and d is the distance between them. The electric field (E) within a PPC is derived as E = Q / (ε₀ × A), confirming that capacitance is independent of the charge on the plates and depends solely on the geometry of the plates and the dielectric material. The discussion emphasizes the fundamental principles of capacitance and its implications in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electrostatics concepts
  • Familiarity with Gaussian surfaces and Gauss's law
  • Knowledge of electric fields and potentials
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Gauss's law in electrostatics
  • Learn about the effects of different dielectrics on capacitance
  • Explore the applications of capacitors in electronic circuits
  • Investigate the relationship between capacitance and energy storage in capacitors
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of electrostatics and capacitance principles.

Humanist
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I'm an engineer, and though I highly doubt I'd use this in my mechanic courses...I do truly want to understand what it is I'm putting into application here:

So I'm going to explain my understanding of capacitance, be prepared for an extensive reading. I'm doing this because I feel like if I'm explaining things to people, I'll understand the underlying concept to an extent that doing problems alone will not. Here it goes (please correct me in any area that I'm wrong in, this is a very basic and humble understanding of my knowledge in electrostatics), also it would be helpful if you wrote along what I'm saying to see where I'm mistaken:

Assume parallel-plated capacitor (PPC) and in a vacuum -

Capacitance (C) is the ratio of charge (Q) to the electric potential (V) of the two conductors in a capacitor, where C is measured in one Farad (Coulomb/Volt). Capacitance is the ability of a capacitor to store charge, and therefore store energy.

Proofing that Electric field (E) of PPC is E = Q / (epsilon-nought x Area of plate):
In a single charged plate, we find through using a Gaussian surface that flux will be equal to 2EA. Setting 2EA equal to Q enclosed over epsilon-nought (Gauss's law) where Q is equal to sigma times Area of Gaussian surface, we find that the electric field for one charged plate is E = sigma / 2epsilon-nought.

Now, in a capacitor, with two charged plates (one negatively charged/one positively charged) the Electric field will be twice that of E = sigma / 2epsilon-nought since the electric field of the negative plate and positive plate are traveling in the same direction (From positive plate to negative plate). So, our Electric field equation for a PPC will be E = Sigma / epsilon-nought. Where Sigma = Charge per unit Area, we also derive E = Q / epsilon-nought x A.

Because the electric field is uniform and given a distance (d) between the two charged plates, we can find the electric potential of the capacitor. From the negative plate to the positive plate, the Electric potential (V) is measured as electric field (E) times the distance between the plates (d). From the previous paragraph, we found E of a PPC is E = Q / epsilon-nought x A. Plugging in, we then get the electric potential (V) = Qd/ (epsilon-nought x A).

Having obtained the Electric potential (V), we then plug into the equation C = Q/V and get:
C = (epsilon-nought x A) / d

Looking at this equation, I conclude that the capacitance of a capacitor is therefore independent of the charges placed on each conductors and is dependent on the sizes of the conductors.

This is what I got out after piecing bits of information on capacitance, and was written through by analysis. Just wanted to confirm if my thinking process was correct in figuring out the capacitance this way, and if there's anything wrong, please let me know. This basic understanding of capacitance will help me understand way more things that I'm doing right now for a course...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Humanist said:
... I conclude that the capacitance of a capacitor is therefore independent of the charges placed on each conductors and is dependent on the sizes of the conductors.
Yes, it is. That's like saying that the length of a ruler doesn't depend on what it measures or the resistance of an ideal wire is independent of the amount of current it is carrying. The charge you put on a capacitor is just something that you do TO the capacitor and does not change its fundamental properties. It has capacitance whether it carries any charge or not.
 
Humanist said:
Having obtained the Electric potential (V), we then plug into the equation C = Q/V and get:
C = (epsilon-nought x A) / d
Not εo. This will be ε which is short-hand for the product εoεr.

Looking at this equation, I conclude that the capacitance of a capacitor is therefore independent of the charges placed on each conductors and is dependent on the sizes of the conductors.
... dependent on the geometry of the plates (area of plates and their separation), as well as the dielectric.
 
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K