Propagation of Uncertainty with Angles

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the propagation of uncertainty in angle calculations derived from distance measurements in an experiment. The user is unsure how to propagate uncertainties through their calculations involving the tangent and sine of angles. A formula for error propagation is provided, indicating that the uncertainty in a function can be derived from the uncertainties in its variables. Example calculations demonstrate how to compute the uncertainty in the angle based on the given distances and their respective uncertainties. Ultimately, the user concludes that the uncertainty in their calculations is 0.01, reflecting the limits of precision in their measurements.
TheJuke
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I conducted an experiment which involves measuring two distances (Y and L) and have used tan to determine the angle, then finally calculated the sine of the angles for use in my analysis.

I have uncertainties in both length measurements and am unsure how to propagate the uncertainties the way through.


Homework Equations


Unsure of what equation to use here.


The Attempt at a Solution


Unsure where to start really.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What level of mathematics have you taken? If you've taken multivariable calculus, it will be really simple to explain.
 
I am currently taking multivariable calculus so that would be great
 
If δf is the uncertainty of a function of f(x1,x2,...,xn) each with error δxi, then the most general equation for the error is (\delta f)^2=\sum_{i=1}^n(\delta x_i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x})^2. If you want a derivation, I would recommend reading Introduction to Error Analysis by Taylor.
 
Thanks so much, I think I have it.

Would you mind having a look over my calculations? I am 100% sure of them as I would expect a far greater error.



Example Calculations:
θ=arctan(6/28)
θ=0.21 radians
sinθ=0.21

Propagation of Uncertainty:
Let r= y/L
∆r= (√((∆y/y)^2+ (∆L/L)^2 ))r
θ=arctan(r)
∆θ=(d(arctan(r))/dr) ∙ ∆r
∆θ(1/d)= 1/(r^2+1) (√((∆y/y)^2+ (∆L/L)^2 ))r

At smallest value:
∆θ(0.5)= 1/((6/28)^2+1) (√((0.25/6)^2+ (0.1/28)^2 ))(6/28)
∆θ=0.00857
∆θ=0.01
At maximum value:
∆θ(0.5)= 1/((18/28)^2+1) (√((0.25/18)^2+ (0.1/28)^2 ))(18/28)
∆θ=0.00652
∆θ=0.01
Therefore the uncertainty in all calculations is 0.01 as this is the limit of the precision in the original measurements.
 
I would have used 0.009 and 0.007 for the two accuracies. Propagation of uncertainty is one of the few cases where I would recommend plugging in numbers at every step. That is because
\frac{\delta r}{\sqrt{r^2+1}}
is easier to calculate than
\frac{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\delta y}{L}\right)^2+\left(\frac{y\times\delta L}{L^2}\right)^2}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{y}{L}\right)^2+1}}
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K