- #1
hholzer
- 37
- 0
If you have, as an example, a 3x3 matrix:
A = { {1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}, {7, 8, 9} }
Such that Ax = 0
and you perform row reductions on it
and at a certain point it reduces to:
{ {1, 2, 3}, { 0, 1, 2}, {0, 1, 2} }
Then you could legitimately remove
one of {0, 1, 2} from the system
as it contributes nothing special, right?
As such, this would indicate that you have
an infinite number of solutions with a
free variable, yes?
(Geometrically: if in the 3x3 case above
you end up with two rows that are the
same after row reductions, then it would
suggest that having a single point as a
solution is an impossibility. As a single point
could only arise from three separate planes.).
A = { {1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}, {7, 8, 9} }
Such that Ax = 0
and you perform row reductions on it
and at a certain point it reduces to:
{ {1, 2, 3}, { 0, 1, 2}, {0, 1, 2} }
Then you could legitimately remove
one of {0, 1, 2} from the system
as it contributes nothing special, right?
As such, this would indicate that you have
an infinite number of solutions with a
free variable, yes?
(Geometrically: if in the 3x3 case above
you end up with two rows that are the
same after row reductions, then it would
suggest that having a single point as a
solution is an impossibility. As a single point
could only arise from three separate planes.).