Proth Primes: Coefficient & Exponent Relations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Proth numbers, defined as k·2^n + 1, where k is an odd positive integer and n is a positive integer satisfying 2^n > k. The inquiry centers on additional relationships between the exponent n and the coefficient k when Proth numbers are prime. Specifically, it highlights that if n is odd and greater than 1, then gcd(k-1, 3) = 1, and if n is even, then gcd(k+1, 3) = 1. The conversation also touches on the Sieve of Eratosthenes and its relevance to identifying patterns in prime and composite numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Proth numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Sieve of Eratosthenes
  • Knowledge of number theory concepts such as gcd (greatest common divisor)
  • Basic grasp of the Riemann Hypothesis and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Proth numbers and their primality tests
  • Study the Sieve of Eratosthenes in depth, focusing on its application to prime number generation
  • Explore the implications of the Riemann Hypothesis on prime distribution
  • Investigate advanced number theory techniques for analyzing relationships between coefficients and exponents in number forms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and anyone interested in prime number research and the properties of Proth numbers.

pedja
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Definition: Proth number is a number of the form :

k\cdot 2^n+1

where k is an odd positive integer and n is a positive integer such that : 2^n>k

My question : If Proth number is prime number are there some other known relations in addition to 2^n>k , between exponent n and coefficient k ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


( n \equiv 1 \pmod 2 \land n > 1) \Rightarrow \gcd(k-1,3)=1

n \equiv 0 \pmod 2 \Rightarrow \gcd(k+1,3)=1
 


I would think it has something to do with the sieve of eratosthenes, where the twin primes revolve around multiples of 6. The formula would give the lesser value for the twin primes.

A few years ago, i decided to look into the riemann hypothesis. I noticed that using the sieve of eratosthenes, there is an obvious pattern for composite numbers. The pattern gets more complex after regions of primes squared. I started to develop a formula but it got more complex with each region, and didn't seam like a good basis for an equation, so I put it off.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K