Prove 2(a³+b³+c³) > a²b + a²c + b²c + b²a + c²a + c²b

  • Thread starter Thread starter Undirrast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality 2(a³ + b³ + c³) > a²b + a²c + b²c + b²a + c²a + c²b holds true for distinct positive numbers a, b, and c. The discussion emphasizes the application of the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean (AM-GM) inequality and the rearrangement inequality to prove this statement. Participants suggest manipulating the left-hand side and applying AM-GM to each term, while also considering symmetric inequalities and homogeneity for simplification. The conclusion is that the inequality can be established through these mathematical principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inequalities, specifically AM-GM inequality
  • Familiarity with symmetric inequalities and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic manipulation and expansion
  • Concept of homogeneity in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the AM-GM inequality and its applications in proving inequalities
  • Explore symmetric inequalities and their proofs
  • Learn about the rearrangement inequality and its implications
  • Investigate homogeneity in inequalities and its use in simplification
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced algebra and inequality proofs will benefit from this discussion.

Undirrast
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a, b and c are distinct positive numbers, show that
<br /> 2 (a^3 + b^3 + c^3) &gt; a^2b + a^2c + b^2c + b^2a + c^2a + c^2b<br />

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to expand from (a+b+c)^3 &gt; 0, also tried (a+b)^3 + (b+c)^3 + (c+a)^3 &gt; 0, and then \frac{a+b+c}{3} &gt; \sqrt[3]{abc}. But with no avail. I guess I'm heading in the wrong direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try playing with:
<br /> a(a-b)^{2}+b(b-c)^{2}+c(c-a)^{2}&gt;0\quad a(a-c)^{2}+b(b-a)^{2}+c(c-b)^{2}&gt;0<br />
along with other things like this to get the answer.
 
Hmm, thanks for your tip off, but I still can't seem to make it...

The 2 is always appearing on the right side of the inequality, but as of the question it's on the right side, if I expand (a-b)^2 the 2 sticks together with ab instead of a^3...
 
Have you heard of the arithmetic mean and geometric mean and their relationship? Try using the AM-GM inequality (it is extremely useful in situations like this, look it up!). Rearrange the left hand side as such: \frac{a^3+a^3+b^3}{3} +... Apply the AM-GM inequality at each term and note exactly when you have equality. An alternative way is to use the rearrangement inequality. Assuming without loss of generality a >= b >= c, the inequality follows immediately, and strict inequality follows from a>c.

Symmetric inequalities as these can very often be solved using the inequalities QM-AM-GM-HM (quadratic, arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means), Rearrangement, Chebychev, Cauchy-Schwarz and Jensens; or a combination of these. Note also that this particular inequality is homogenous, so you can assume e.g. a+b+c=1, or a^3+b^3+c^3=1. That might also be useful in some situations.
 
Last edited:
Jarle said:
Have you heard of the arithmetic mean and geometric mean and their relationship? Try using the AM-GM inequality (it is extremely useful in situations like this, look it up!). Rearrange the left hand side as such: \frac{a^3+a^3+b^3}{3} +... Apply the AM-GM inequality at each term and note exactly when you have equality.

I think I got it, by using \frac{a+b}{2}&gt;\sqrt{ab}, etc and by multiplying a and b respectively then adding up all together made it. Thanks for all the tips!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K