Prove a Laplace Transform Equality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving a Laplace Transform equality using the definition of the Laplace Transform and relevant theorems. The user initially attempted to solve the integral ∫[e^(-st) - e^(-t(s-1))]/t dt but struggled with the algebra and variable substitution. A suggestion was made to utilize a theorem regarding piecewise continuous functions of exponential order, which simplifies the calculation without relying solely on the formal definition of the Laplace Transform.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace Transforms and their definitions
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, particularly improper integrals
  • Knowledge of piecewise continuous functions and exponential order
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the theorem regarding Laplace Transforms of functions divided by t
  • Learn about piecewise continuous functions and their properties
  • Explore the concept of exponential order in the context of Laplace Transforms
  • Review techniques for solving integrals involving exponential functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying differential equations, mathematicians interested in Laplace Transforms, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of integral calculus and its applications in engineering and physics.

Italo Campoli
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that http://www4f.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP26931c1531g07285beh7000062h7f6g1ggd95eea?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=5&w=98.&h=38. =http://www4f.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP6901c153574d0bdbh20000048829f0g4d1fi1d0?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=5&w=69.&h=35.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the Def of Laplace i got to ∫[e ^ -st - e ^ -t(s-1)] / t dt ; of course with limits from 0 to infinite

tryed then to do a variable change of w = st but i got inmmerse on a huge process of solving

∫{ [e ^ -w . e ^ (1/s-1)w] / w/s } dw/s , i know that the change was wrong from that point and i have been trying to solve it for parts or another change but haven't got across any luck with that so far

Id appreciate some help or any advice in how to proceed from that point, its the only problem left to finish my homework and its driving me crazy :S

Side Note: i haven´t seen yet Inverse Laplace, but a fellow Math Degree friend told me that using that i might solve it pretty easy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Italo Campoli said:

Homework Statement



Prove that http://www4f.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP26931c1531g07285beh7000062h7f6g1ggd95eea?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=5&w=98.&h=38. =http://www4f.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP6901c153574d0bdbh20000048829f0g4d1fi1d0?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=5&w=69.&h=35.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the Def of Laplace i got to ∫[e ^ -st - e ^ -t(s-1)] / t dt ; of course with limits from 0 to infinite

I would first check your algebra in multiplying e-st by e-t / t
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't have to use the formal definition of a Laplace transform because there is a theorem that will greatly simplify the calculation.

Theorem: Suppose ##f(t)## is piecewise continuous and of exponential order. By exponential order, I mean there exists a constant ##\alpha## such that ##e^{- \alpha t} |f(t)| \to 0## as ##t \to \infty##.

Suppose further ##\mathcal{L} \{ f(t) \} = F(s)## for ##s > c \geq 0##, and ##\displaystyle \lim_{t \to 0^+} \frac{f(t)}{t}## exists. Then:

$$\mathcal{L} \left \{ \frac{f(t)}{t} \right \} = \int_s^{\infty} F(x) \space dx, \quad s > c$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Italo Campoli

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K