Prove a rotationally symmetric central force field is conservative

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that a rotationally symmetric central force field, defined by the function F(x) = xg(|x|), is conservative. The context includes discussions on the continuity of the function g and the implications for the force field's properties.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions under which F is conservative, discussing the need for an antiderivative and the implications of continuity. There is a focus on differentiating the function G and whether the function f should be scalar-valued.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest differentiating the antiderivative G(|x|) to establish that F is the gradient of a scalar function. Others express uncertainty about the completeness of their understanding and seek confirmation of their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the codomain of the function f and the necessity of including absolute values in the formulation of the force field. The discussion reflects on the assumptions made about the continuity of g and its implications for the proof.

Ryker
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Suppose g:(0, +∞) → ℝ is continuous, and consider F:ℝd\{0} → ℝd, where F(x) = xg(|x|). Prove F is conservative.

Homework Equations


F is conservative iff there exists a C1 function f:ℝd\{0} → ℝd, s.t. F = grad(f). (edit: Or is the codomain of f actually ℝ, so that it's a scalar-valued function? I namely may have put it down wrong in class.)

F is conservative if, for every closed rectifiable path ∫Fdx = 0.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried approaching this problem from both angles, i.e. "relevant equations", and came to the conclusion (might be wrong, of course) that if I'm to prove this the second one won't be of particular help. So I went for the first one and tried to construct the function f.

Here's where I run into problems, though. Since g is continuous, we know it has an anti-derivative, call it G. But...
[tex]\frac{\partial G}{\partial x_{i}} = \frac{x_{i} h(|x|)}{|x|} =: H[/tex]
So the numerator is fine, but I can't get rid of |x|. I then also though of saying that H is conservative, and then showing |x|H is also such. But I can't get anywhere with that, either.

Any help here would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If g(|x|) is continuous then so is |x|g(x). Call the antiderivative of that G(|x|).
 
And then just differentiate G(|x|) to show that F is indeed grad(f), where f is just G? Is that it or am I missing something? Because if that IS it, then damn I'm slow, I can't believe I didn't arrive to that conclusion myself.
 
Ryker said:
And then just differentiate G(|x|) to show that F is indeed grad(f), where f is just G? Is that it or am I missing something? Because if that IS it, then damn I'm slow, I can't believe I didn't arrive to that conclusion myself.

No, that's all there is to it. And f is a scalar. Force laws are usually written in terms of a unit vector times magnitude, (x/|x|)*m(|x|). Then you can just integrate m. Your form is missing that extra absolute value so you need to put it back in. x*g(|x|)=(x/|x|)*|x|*g(|x|).
 
Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K